Rise up for America

who naturally make-up the larger part of the targeted community. There-after, the Criminal Parasite-

Class may Pillage and Plunder the targeted and then defenseless community as they see fit.

This document further intends to show that, over the thousands of years that those Parasite-

Classes have been practicing this Subversion of these other-wise sovereign and independent

communities, the Techniques for such Subversive Process has ben Reduced to a “Precise Science”.

These “Subversive Techniques” have been Passed-Down, form Generation to Generation of Parasite

Class Members, with each generation constantly making minor improvements in the efficiency of that

criminally subversive, parasitical, and evil process; to the point where modernly the ability of that

criminal class do deceive & plunder targeted populations is absolutely incredible. Historically; that

criminally subversive class has captured the vast majority of human communities all over the planet,

and reduced them to their obedient slaves. This author estimates that, modernly, their parasitical

process of deception and subversion has become so efficient that it has achieved approximately 95 %

dominance in American and British National Culture, with even greater levels of influence in most

other cultures, and that all of that will not be exorcized from any of these cultures without that criminal

parasite class causing significant social unrest among the people who organically compose our

respective constitutional national bodies-politic.

That unpleasant but necessary foundational-point now being briefly explained, it is very

pleasant to find hope in the fact that, since those very early ancient years or the first occurrences of

that Despotism, there have been Honorable People who have dreamed of and sought to Engineer

“Modes of Governing” which were capable of Immunizing their own localized organic Bodies-Politic

from Infiltration by the Criminal Parasite-Classes which constantly surrounded them and attempted to

Subvert their collective ability to Defend them-selves from Hostile Pillage and Plunder. These ideas

of developing a System of Government which can truly Defend it-self from Pillage and Plunder from

Parasite-Classes are not new. Many honorable people over multitudes of generations have spent

countless hours contemplating these concepts. Although modern fashionable opinion seems to be to

the contrary, the result has been, that, at a number of times and places through-out history, "Free

Government" has actually been established, and has actually functioned in manners which successfully

by facilitate the ability of those communities to exist and organically-function in impressive levels of

Harmony with what might be termed as “Sociological Natural-Law”.

Here-under, the First Concern of this memorandum/document/book is to show that True

American "Constitutional-Law”, correctly comprehended; is firmly based on a few Fundamental

Principles of "Natural-Law". These Fundamental Principles of "Natural Law" have become solidified

through eons of time of Voluntary Practice and Implementation, in the nations of Israel, England, most

of Northern Europe, perhaps by some American Indians, and seemingly in some other nations. All

Honorable People who have become fully aware of this Process have Unanimously “Consented to be

Governed” by them. These ancient practices have slowly solidified into that specific set of "Step-by-

Step Procedures" which have become known as “Due Process of Law”, as enshrined in the “Fifth

Amendment” of the written “U.S. Constitution” document. Because All of the Common People

Process, this Process has also became known under the different name of the “Common-Law”, as

enshrined in the Seventh Amendment. Through this tried and true practice over these eons of time,

these Communities of People have honorably and responsibly sought to Advance their Community's

Collective Reasoning Capabilities and Consciences, in their own efforts to "Responsibly Self-Govern".

They usually considered this effort at “Responsible Self-Government” to be their “Duty before "God",

how-ever each of those communities conceived God.

Here-under; this memorandum/document will show that the Primary Mechanical

Constitutional Tool for Enabling our American People to Organize Our-Selves Harmoniously with this

Sociologically-based "Natural-Law"; is that specific, ancient, traditional, already-existing, and

"Originally Intended" set of "Step-by-Step Procedures" which has been written into our "U.S.

Constitution" document under our "Fifth Amendment" as "Due Process of Law", and under our

"Seventh Amendment" as the "Rules of the Common-Law".

Further here-under; this document will seek to prove that, as the phrase is properly

comprehended and applied in its sociological sense with-in our collectively living-breathing American

National Community of People and Organic Body-Politic; that True American "Constitutional-Law"

is devoted to the Singular 'End Goal' of achieving 'Harmony' amongst the People of this nation, with

this pre-existing and universal form of "Natural-Law". This necessarily implies, that, any legislative

statute, judicial case-law-precedent, or administrative or executive command, that does Not

"Harmonize" with this American Sociological "Natural-Law", is there-fore "Un-Constitutional", and

there-by "Null and Void". In fact, this word "Harmony", as used in this communitarian or social

sense; has No-Meaning out-side of a Frame-Work of this "Natural-Law". This is true because, as

shown more fully here-in; these "Natural-Laws" are "Necessary Guidelines" for every member of

every community of people every-where to follow, in order for them to Harmoniously achieve and

The study of this Sociological "Natural Law" is necessarily "Philosophical"; and so it is based

on Fundamental far-reaching "Principles", rather than on strict statutory or other-wise written

mandates. This is true because no individual on this planet can plausibly claim to know everything

about this sociological "Natural-Law"; yet every honest person will admit that Every man or woman

in the community Must Comply with this “Sociological Natural-Law”, in order for Natural Social

Harmony and Peace to be maintained in that community. Most people will also admit that, given

opportunity for un-rushed rational-discussion with others of similar honorable concern, Every

Honorable Individual Can Make fairly Accurate "Judgements" concerning whether or not any specific

individual has Violated one of these "Fundamental Principles" of this Sociological "Natural Law".

To illustrate the importance of firmly grasping these "Fundamental Principles" of our

American System of Constitutional-Law and Government, this author opens by citing a quote, which

seems to me to illustrate this point very well. This passage appears in a number of State Constitutions,

including the Washington State's Constitution's "Bill of Rights" at "Article 1 Section 32"; which reads

as follows:

This author has seen almost identical statements in numerous other American State

Constitutions. All reputable American constitutional law scholars will admit that our written state and

national constitutions mandate that all public-servants in our national and smaller jurisdictions

consistently check to be sure that every action taken by them in harmonious with and supportive of

these fundamental principles of our American system of constitutional law and government. It is

"Essential" that all of the public-servants in our American nation frequently focus on our nation's

"Fundamental Constitutional Principles"; because, as shown in the quote above, this very process is

"Essential" to the continued existence of our American Constitutional System of "Free Government".

Our American constitutional word of "Law" clearly implies this Singularly-Focused and Strictly-

Disciplined Close-Adherence to these "Fundamental Principles". These are constitutionally-mandated

and natural-law based “Norms of Behavior”, and they are very closely and solidly linked to our natural

human capacity for Reasoning and Logical Thinking about the General Welfare of the Common

Here-under; every individual with a Functional Conscience and Minimal Intelligence,

including all public-servants, should be quite capable of Instinctively Harmonizing with these

sociologically Natural-Law based norms of behavior.

Further here-under; all honorably concerned Americans should clearly realize that: anyone

who says that they are concerned about American Constitutional-Law, but who refuses to also discuss

the "Fundamental Principles" embodied there-in, is speaking Falsely. No individual can correctly

claim to be speaking about "Constitutional-Law", unless he focuses clearly on these "Fundamental

Principles". This is precisely where every serious student of American Constitutional-Law needs to

start and finish his examination of this critically-important subject. All cases and controversies in all

true and Constitutional “Courts of Law” Must be decided through exhaustive examination and

discussion of how that community can most effectively Resolve that Case through Harmonizing with

these "Fundamental Principles" of Constitutional-Law.

Under applicable American Constitutional-Law; any knowing or willful Obstruction of these

"Fundamental Principles", by any Public-Servant, including judges and executive personnel; will

render those individual Public-Servants lawfully "Un-Protected", and subject to Criminal Complaint

and Prosecution. "Obstruction of Justice" and "Jury Tampering" are "Crimes" under our American

Constitution, and (as will be show here-in and in accompanying documents), these Crimes are

Routinely Committed against Innocent Common Americans by Corrupted Judges and other Public-

Servants all across this once grand nation. The fact that it is modernly very un-common for any such

corrupted Public-Servant to be Prosecuted Criminally for these Crimes, merely underscores the fact

that our nations modern "Machinery of Government" has strayed very far from these Fundamental

Principles of our American Constitutional-Law.

In order to more fully appreciate America's Constitution's "Fundamental Principles", serious

students of this subject are asked to imagine a picture in their minds, where they have just newly

observed a partially hidden and disturbingly noisy machine, which is of critical importance to their

continued welfare. Clearly, they must discover as much information as possible about the basic

mechanical operations of this machine, in order to judge for them-selves whether or not the noise

coming there-from is an indication of the machine's proper or dangerously mal-functioning operation.

By the same token; it is of critical importance for serious students of the subject to grasp the

Fundamental Principles of our American System of Constitutional Law and Government, so that they

may discern from the noises coming from the public-offices which compose that machinery of that

government, whether or not those noises are indicators of efficiently balanced mechanical "Harmony",

or whether those governmental noises are indicators of dangerous friction and looming disasters.

Through such studies as these, the serious student will become empowered to Judge for

Himself (and to advise those seeking his guidance and direction), whether or not the noises coming

from these different governmental offices are proceeding in Harmony with Higher “American

Constitutional-Law”. This is a critically-important issue; and the knowledge presented here-in for

There are basically two categories of study covered in this document, consisting of the

Reasoning and Philosophy which under-lies these concepts of Natural-Law and Common-Law, and the

History of how our American nation's "Common-Law" has become Obligatory over every one of our

nation's organic body-politic's members, and especially over our public-servants. The "Reasoning"

discussion focuses primarily on "Philosophy" and the "Fundamental Principles" which are to be found

in this "Natural-Law" and "Common-Law". The "History" discussion is cited in efforts to show that

the Courage of the Heroes of our American Revolution only Fought and Died for this Grand Cause of

"Liberty and Justice for All", because they Firmly Knew that such "Liberty and Justice" Was

"Mechanically Obtainable", if only, their posterity (children, us) would Adhere to the "Fundamental

Principles" of our American Nation's System of "Constitutional Government", as then had already

been very solidly crystallized into the specific "Rules of the Common-Law", and as "Due Process of

Law". This "History" discussion will make passing reference to the Natural-Law and Philosophical

issues, in efforts to illustrate how many of our American People are "Justified" in Demanding that our

people's ancient body of "Common-Law Jurisprudence" is to be Respected and Observed by the

Public-Servants who are entrusted with responsibly and lawfully operating the Machinery of our

American Government.

The men who fought and died to make this nation Free, generally believed in a Philosophy

based on "Natural-Law" and "Natural-Rights", and which they then frequently referred to simply as

"God-Given Rights", because almost every-one back then did not question the existence of a supreme

spiritual being. Most of those early American heroes saw No Conflict between this "Natural-Law"

philosophy, and the "Laws of God"; and they "Originally Intended" for their Posterity to be Governed

under a Harmoniously Merged Philosophy based on both of these ideals. This 'History' under-lying

our American system of Constitutional-Law and Government can logically be seen as consistently and

repeatedly promoting this very same Natural-Law Philosophy.

This repeated history of seeking Harmony with the Principles and Philosophy of this "Natural-

Law" will be shown here-in to be the 'Primary Goal' of the Honorable Men involved in the Framing of

our American Constitutional System of Government. Through a close examination of these general

Natural-Law based "Principles" and "Philosophy" on which our American Constitutional System of

Government is based; here-by will be seen the broadest and most complete picture possible of the

subject of American Constitutional-Law.

An important point here is that, this documents main subject of the "Fundamental Principles of

American Constitutional Law and Government", may be described by many different words and

phrases, all of which mean essentially the same thing. A fairly complete list of these synonymous

words and phrases would include the following: "Federalism", "Constitutional-Law", "Natural-Law",

"Justice", "Liberty", "Common-Law", "Due Process of Law", "Due Course of Law", the "Law of the

Land", "Maxims of Law", "Public-Law", "General-Law", "Organic-Law", "Republicanism",

"Democracy", "Malum In Se", and at least two religious phrases, which will be largely ignored in this

Anglo/American definitions of the words "Law" and "Justice". Many of these terms are more fully

explained from the "Black's Law Dictionary" quotations which are quoted later in this document.

Please refer to them now, if you feel so motivated. The phrase "Maximizing Local Responsible

Sovereign Self-Governing Authority", is a slightly longer phrase which might convey the same basic

meaning with a bit more detail.

Unfortunately; many of these terms are also purposefully used by the parasite classes which

infect our modern organic body-politic, in their efforts to falsely imply Dis-Harmony and Differences

between these generally positive words and phrases. This is done so that these powerful terms can not

be effectively merged into a common argument to compel public-servants to respect their Duties to

Defend our organic body-politic/communities from the parasitical classes which so routinely seek to

pillage and plunder us. By such adulteration of our ancient Anglo/American "Words of Law", these

subversive and parasitical classes have confused, divided, and conquered, the vast majority of the

students of our American System of Constitutional Law and Government. And because most serious

students of this subject have there-by become hopelessly confused; there-by, these subversive and

parasitical classes have driven wedges and “Factionalized” the people who organically compose our

entire modern American nation.

But when, through such detailed explanations as are presented here-in, the true socially

organic root-definition of each of these phrases is fully comprehended, then the student can be in the

Firm Possession of such Solid and Powerful “Knowledge” of the matter, that he can No Longer be

“Bamboozled” into accepting any “False Belief-System” by those Malicious and Parasitical Classes

who so routinely seek to use those False-Definitions of these generally good terms, in their malicious

and habitual efforts to Pillage and Plunder these students, and all other members of our American

organic body-politic.

These are the main basic concepts which will be explained in much greater detail in this

book/memorandum document. With this general out-line of what is intended to be covered in this

document now completed, it is now logical to proceed to examining the more specific Details which

support the largely un-orthodox and un-fashionable propositions contained in this general out-line.

Here-under; specific historical Definitions of words; and specific, well-settled and historical “Due-

Process” and “Common-Law” concepts, can all be used to “fill-in the blank spaces” which still remain

from this brief and general out-line. Here-by; this author will more completely “fill-in the details” of

this larger picture of the Sociological "Natural-Laws" of our American-National Body-Politic, and of

the Due-Process and Common-Law “Immune System” concepts up-on which it is so dependant for its

continuing collective “Health”; all of which may collectively be referred to as “the Fundamental

Principles of our American System of Constitutional Law and Government”.

As a preliminary step; there are some important “Citations” to reputable sources which need to

be quoted and relied on in order for a proper Foundation to be laid for the reader to fully grasp the

“Fundamental Principles of American Constitutional Law and Government”. This author believes that

by merely examining these citations closely, the reader may gain profound insight into the subjects

discussed here-in. These Citations are presented here early in this document, so that it can be skippedover

by those inclined in that direction, or examined closely before proceeding further. However, the

significant importance of these Citations is properly reflected by their placement here, at the beginning

of this document; so whether you skip them or not, please remember that these Citations are right up

front here, on the numerous occasions when you will do well to refer back to them, as you examine the

more involved discussions presented in the larger body of this text.

In efforts to lay a bit broader foundation to the above definition of the word "State", this

author now cites another, older, and frequently precious source, entitled simply as "Law Dictionary";

by "John Bouvier"; as composed by him in 1856; and worded as follows:

Un-fortunately, and as more fully shown later here-in and in accompanying documents; there

were many "Coercive" elements written into the general body of the so-called "U.S. Constitution"

document. Those "Coercive" elements written into the "U.S. Constitution" document are "In Conflict"

with the more Fundamental Principles which are also generally Mandated in that very same

document's own "Preamble", and its own "Bill of Rights". It is Universally Conceded among Honest

Scholars who have studied these less coercive sections of this document, that these sections are Clearly

Designed to Promote the perpetuation of the True Natural and Organic Laws of Justice, Peace, Safety,

Liberty, and a "More Perfect Union", amongst "We the People".

Here-under: it should be clear, that, from with-in that documents general body of “Conflicting

Messages”, Only the words which there-in articulate "Good Principles" of Governmental Policy, and

which are based clearly on "Natural Law", may Accurately be referred to as "American

Constitutional-Law", in its true, Fundamental and Organic sense. And since True Constitutional

"Law" can Not be "In-Conflict" with it-self, something must give. This means that, when-ever a

"Conflict" arises, that the Lesserly Important and Non-Fundamental Provisions must be “Disregarded”;

and there-under, they must be recognized to be considered “lawless”, and of “Zero Importance”.

This fact, that True "Law" can Not be in Conflict with it-self, is illustrated well through one of

this authors favorite quotations, which reads as follows:

This scholarly law article from “Professor Hart”, as he wrote for the “Columbia Law Review”;

clearly Explains that there is a “Single System of Law” which “Governs Daily Living in the United

States”. This is how "Law" is Suppose to Work in our Constitutional Republic. Multitudes of other

similar sources all say basically the same thing, all from a myriad of interesting different angles and

schools of thought; and all of which center around a central philosophy of what can be referred to as

Sociological “Natural-Law”. These concepts are discussed much more fully in the following subsections

of this document. But the main point here is, that, like the different “State Constitutions”

mentioned above; there are Many Voices which collectively “Speak ... with Only One Ultimately

Authoritative Voice”; just as Professor Hart above so declares. Here-under, the central proposition is,

that; in American society, All Honorable People can be brought to Unanimously Recognize True and

Universally-Applicable "Law". Just like the "Law of Gravity" is a Universally Recognizable by all

honorable scholars of the physical sciences, so similarly will “Sociological Natural-Law” be

Recognized Universally among All Serious Students of Social-Justice. From the opposite angle,

anyone who Speaks Against what might be called this Sociological “Natural-Law” philosophy, should

be recognized by his opponents to be “Speaking Law Falsely”. And because it is necessary that the

well-balanced “Rule of Law” be Maintained in the Community, if this man’s Dis-Harmonious and Un-

Lawful Voice Repeatedly Appears, after fair warnings; then his Un-Lawful Voice Must be Ostracized

from the discussion, because he and his voice are “Out-Side” of the true sociologically natural/organic

“Constitutional-Law”. It is this precise sociologically natural-organic concept which has resulted in

the traditional Anglo/American declarations that some problematic people are “Out-Laws”. A close

examination of Professor Hart’s words, above, clearly implies that this traditional “Common-Law

Process” for Firmly Judging between “Lawful” and “Lawless” Voices and People, has been Preserved

Modernly and unfortunately; this "Single System of Law" is Seldom Used, mostly because,

almost all modern Americans simply have no idea how to either articulate True “Law”, or to access it.

And most bar-member attorneys are suffering under the same affliction, because these originallyintended,

organic, people-empowering, constitutional-concepts, are Not Taught in their orthodox/civil

“Law-Schools”.

Unfortunately, in the natural universe of human societies, there frequently exists great

Difficulty in discovering the true "Single Voice of the Law". Frequently, it is only people of minor

social influence who seem inspired to Correctly Discern and Speak the true "Single Voice of the Law".

Fortunately, how-ever; our American Constitutional System Demands that Allowances be

Continuously Made for these "Minority Voices" to at least be heard. One particular but generally

obscured citation, which this author finds very supportive of this un-orthodox assertion, reads as

follows:

When this citation is combined with the "Freedom of Speech" Rights of Every American, as

recognized in the "First Amendment"; then, this citation seems to indicate that: exercising a True

Constitutional “Jurisdiction" can be done by "Any Person" who merely Accurately Speaks True

American "Constitutional-Law". Where-as fashionable American notions about "Jurisdiction" might

render the practical application of this proposition a bit difficult, in the light of previous discussion

surrounding Professor Hart's citation; it is clear that Any Person who Accurately "Speaks

Constitutional-Law", will Not be in "Competition" with any others who are also Speaking True

"Constitutional-Law"; but rather that they will All Unanimously be Saying precisely the "Same

Thing".

So; Any individual American has the Lawful Right to Exercise His Own “Jurisdiction” to

“Speak Law”, at least so long as he or she does it Accurately. For example, at the Local Government

level; if a "bag-lady", from sleeping under a bridge or directly off of the street, attempts to "Speak

Law" for the local governing authorities; she should have nothing to fear from the honest and

conscience-bound local public-office-holders. This is true, because, All Persons Surrounding that

local public-office-holder who are Accurately Speaking such "Constitutional-Law" will be Saying

what amounts to the "Same Thing". Here-under; logic and reason will dictate that they should

appreciate the added weight of the bag-lady’s voice in joining with theirs, as opposed to being critical

of it. There Should Be "No Competition" there, among all those who are Accurately Speaking True

American "Constitutional-Law". There is absolutely zero reason for any such competition, conflict, or

concern.

Here-under; the First Task at hand is to Discover "Which Voice" among the many conflicting

and confusion-generating voices "Really Carries Ultimate Authority"; just as Professor Hart has so

insightfully declared, as quoted above. At its first examination, the task of discovering precisely

which among this chaotic multitude of voices in our Nation's People is Accurately "Speaking True

Law" for our National Organic Body-Politic, may seem to be an insurmountable task. Yet, because the

True Organic Sources of our Body-Politic's Anglo-American Constitutional-Law are so very

"Ancient", honorably-concerned students of this critically-important study have numerous "Guide-

Posts", especially from with-in the previously-mentioned English "Common-Law", to direct us in this

effort.

advocates; if this bag-lady, or any other member of the local community, are "Falsely Speaking Law",

after Repeated “Fair Warnings”; then the more responsible Community Members should move to

Formally Purge her voice from further discussion at their “Local Level”. Such habitual "False

Speakers of Law" would soon Loose their Status as "Qualified Electors" in such a Lawfully Run Local

Jurisdiction. Here-by, and from the very start; the potential for Chaos and Confusion to reduce the

entire governmental deliberations into lawless anarchy and/or despotism (same thing), will be

“Eliminated”. Further here-under; bag-ladies or any others who do not have "Good Reputations" in

these smaller communities for Accurately "Speaking Law", would Justifiably be “Stone-Walled” at

that Local Jurisdictional Level, and there-by the chaos and confusion which they are transmitting

would never be allowed to distract the discussions at the larger organic body-politic jurisdictional

levels.

This is all how the “Single-Voice” of True “Law” was "Originally Intended" to be “Defined”

with-in Local Communities all across our early American Nation. This is how America was originally

"Constitutionally Designed" to be run. In these smaller localized "Common-Law Communities" of

Government, our very profoundly inspired bag-lady or other generally disenfranchised individuals

would have the Right to Demand that Their Voice be Heard, and that the Merits of Their Versions of

applicable "Law" would be rightfully Discussed, Openly and Completely. Such Discussions were and

are Obligated to Continue until they are Lawfully Recognized either as the profound source of

Wisdom which they are; or, alternatively and unfortunately, until they are recognized as nothing more

than sources of chaos and confusion. Andy such knowingly Habitual Offenders as this should have

their "Qualified Elector" Status Removed from them, because they are generating confusion and chaos

in their local community, as opposed to any beneficial insight. Such Offences are in Violation of

Supreme “Organic Constitutional-Law” and “Sociological Natural-Law” (same thing); and if the

Community is going to Survive, long-term, then it must firmly separate it-self from such selfdestructive

influences.

To summarize; it is only through this "Common-Law" System of Smaller Localized "Jury

Trials", that the "Single Voice" of True Constitutional-Law can be Spoken, Unanimously; and where

the natural individualized implications of the word "Juris-Diction" can be given it's True Meaning.

This "Common-Law" would be a very Good Choice to use as a modern "Guide-Post" in Charting the

Course of the modern American "Ship of State". This is true for at least three reasons, as follows: 1:

Common-Law was Very "Highly Respected" by the Common People in Early America, and it was in

popular use among them from the smallest to the largest levels of government; 2: Common-Law was

Powerfully Supported in the written “U.S. Constitution” document, especially through the Profoundly

Powerful Wording of the “Seventh Amendment” contained there-in; 3: Common-Law was the main

decision-making process Embodied In our American Nations First Written "Constitution" document,

entitled as the "Articles of Confederation”, al of which functioned quite well to enable our ancestors to

organize with sufficient efficiency to Throw Off the Tyranny of the most Powerful Military Force on

the Planet at that time; 4: Common-Law was functioning at least for many centuries as "Supreme

Governing Law", in pre-1066-ad/pre-Norman-Conquest England; and even earlier in numerous other

Unfortunately; this idea of the Lawful Right of the “Common People” to "Speak Law" is also

In "Bold Conflict" with the modernly Fashionable Belief that Only "Public-Servants" can "Speak Law"

for the American People. That False but fashionable idea is derived from the Roman "Civil Law",

where-in all power and authority flows from the "Emperor", who was at minimum considered to Speak

the "Voice of God", and frequently to actually Be "God". In that Roman Empire, "Slave Trading" was

the "Driving Force" that Sustained that Entire Social-Governing System; and the "Common People"

could hardly be allowed to "Speak Law" there-in, or their Entire Authoritarian Governmental Structure

would be in very dangerous risk of totally Collapsing, from any sudden natural manifestation of

"Public Conscience" from among the common populace.

As shown later in this document; the so-called Roman "Civil-Law" and English "Common-

Law" are the Only Two Bodies of "Law" which have any significant influence in these United States

of America. Admiralty-Law, Maritime, Contract, Commercial, Military, Administrative-Law; these

are all derived from Roman-based "Civil-Law". This fact will be proven through reputable citations

presented later in this document, and some briefer citations supporting this fact can be gleaned from

the "Black's Law Dictionary" Citations presented later here-in.

This existence of "Civil-Law" in our American Constitutional System of Government raises

another significant concern. As Professor Hart above indicated; there are multitudes of Other

"Conflicting Voices", which, Falsely, but publicly, also declare them-selves to be Speaking "Law"

Accurately. These "Conflicting Voices" are frequently articulated by National "Public-Servants" of

very high position. Presidential "Executive Orders", and numerous other "Administrative Decisions"

from within the Executive Department are excellent examples here. This modern phenomenon closely

resembles the dictates of the ancient Emperors of Rome. However; the Judiciary, along with even the

Legislature, are also frequently quite Guilty of Contributing to the Chaos and Confusion of what is

True "Constitutional Law" for "We the People" who organically compose our American Nation.

But the blame does not stop here. Many people in significant Private positions of influence

over our national body-politic consciousness also contribute to the chaos and confusion which is so

modernly epidemic there-in. Examples of these Private National Social-Confusion Generating People

would be Law-School Professors, Corporate Attorneys, Corporate Media Executives and their Spokes-

People, and the very important "Church Leaders". And the Bankers and Insurance Executives who

Knowingly and Willfully Feed these "Voices of Confusion" through their Control the Flow of Capital

to them, and their Obstruction of that very same "Flow of Capital" to the "True Voices of the

American People", also share a very significant part of the blame. Campaign-Financing and

Lobbying, in particular, places tremendous pressure from these Private Controllers of our Nation's

Financial-Capital on our Nation's Public-Servants, to Confuse our Nation's People's Public-

Consciousness in Discovering, Articulating, and Obeying, our National Organic Body-Politic's Single

and True "Voice of Constitutional-Law".

But here-under; it is self-evident and probably universally agreed, that, there are many voices

seeking the authority to "speak law" for our nation; and that our modern American political

(legislative, judicial, and executive) system, is presently acting very "Chaotic"; and that our Nation

can probably accurately be described, by applying to it, Professor Harts phrase about "Suffering a

Nervous Break-down". Obviously, in order to insure the Health of our American National Organic

Body-Politic, some form of "Remedy" must be found to alleviate this Sickness of "Confusion in the

Laws" which Govern our National Body-Politic. Under the True Un-Written Organic "Constitutional-

Law" of our American People; All modern Elected Public-Servants have a "Prioritized Constitutional-

Duty" to do what-ever is with-in their power to Steer the Machinery of the Governmental Offices

which they hold, along the "Well-Charted Course" embodied with-in the here-in expressed and ancient

"Fundamental Principles of our Anglo/American System of Constitutional Law and Government".

While observing this "Well Charted Course", these Elected Public-Servants are Obligated to Use Their

"Conscience" and their "Reasoning" Process, so-as-to Seek Natural/Organic Truth, Justice, Safety, and

Peace; for our American Body-Politic of Common People. This is true, because, the ancient

Fundamental Anglo/American Principles of our Nation's "Constitutional-Law" Require that our

National "Ship of State" be Piloted and Steered Precisely along this course, With-in these Strict

Parameters, in order that these Prioritized "End Goals" of our Legitimate American Government, of

Truth, Justice, Safety, and Peace; may be finally Secured for our American People.

Here-under, and with All Due Deference to our nations present written "U.S. Constitution"

document; if a "Unanimous Jury" declares that "Just Cause is Shown" under the Natural-Law based

"Higher-Law" of our nation's ancient "Fundamental Principles" of our Organic "Constitutional-Law",

to Adjust the Course of our American "Ship of State", Out-Side of the Parameters specified in the socalled

"U.S. Constitution" document; then certainly, and with-out any un-due delay, the Single-Voice

of our True American Constitutional-Law Requires All Public-Servants to Immediately Adjust the

Course of the Governmental Machinery of the "Public-Offices" which They are entrusted to Control,

so that our national Ship of State will feel the inclination from Their Public-Office to also Adjust its

Course along this "More Constitutional" Pathway.

This powerful Deference to "Jury Verdicts" is the Clear "Intent" under-lying the "Seventh

Amendment", which reads as follows:

This wording clearly implies that our American Constitutional Common-Law "Trial-by-Jury"

process, is the "Highest Decision-Making" process available in our nation's Constitutional System of

Government. That is what these words clearly imply. Please take the time here to meditate on these

words, if this point continues to elude you. It is a critically-important point.

Under conclusions more fully presented later, but drawn through the study of our American

Constitutional "Trail by Jury" Process; and also in light of this documents early quotation from

Professor Hart, and perhaps a few other sources set forth previously here-in; a bold and powerful

"Fundamental Principle of American Constitutional Government" becomes clear: True Governmental

Declarations of "Law" may Only be "Spoken" by the Single "Unanimous" Voice of a "Common-Law

Jury". Everything else is "Provisional", or temporary; waiting around until a proper common-law jury

decides to take the controversy into consideration.

In more natural-law and common-law terms; these Juries are the Only "Law Declaring" or

"Law Finding" power; because, as shown else-where here-in, Sociological "Natural-Law" is the Only

True, Essential Definition of "Law" in our American Nation. This is true because this Natural form of

"Law" is Already "Pre-Existing"; and it can Not be "Made" by any human or group of humans. It can

only be "Found" or "Discovered", through the Unanimous Agreement of the People of Good

Reputation in Their Communities. Here-under; the Only Process which even pretends to be Capable

of Accomplishing this significantly burdensome task, is our nations ancient Common-Law “Trial by

Jury” process. Here-in; Sociological “Natural-Law” has Already Been “Discovered, in multitudes of

previous and ancient jury trials; and it is available in our modern law books under our nation's

traditional concept of "Maxims of Law", and as "the Rules of the Common-Law", and as our

traditional Anglo/American "Due Process of Law". Once the quasi-modern roman-law based

confusion is filtered-out, and there-after a clear picture of the true fundamental principles of this entire

process is firmly grasped; then, under our written national "U.S. Constitution" document, it is easy to

conclude that our Anglo/American Constitutional "Juries" Are the Only True "Law-Making Power" of

this nation.

All public-servant office-holders who Refuse to lend the weight of their voices to such a

Correct "Speaking-of-Law", are in direct Violation of their Oath to up-hold the Constitution of these

United States of America. That very same "Law" provides that those Delinquent Public-Servants may

be directly and forcibly Removed from the Public-Offices which they hold, for Dereliction of Their

Duties to the American People. And mere bag-ladies can Lawfully be placed in charge there-in, if

that seems to those honorably concerned that she is the one person in their community who is capable

of "Speaking-Law" Correctly for that entire Community. There-after; the only task remaining to

preform is for the Executive Personnel to promptly Implement that New and more Correct Juris-

Dictional “Speaking of Law".

At the outer-fringes of its secular discussion, the complete "Natural-Law Philosophy" study

which must be examined in order to clearly identify the "Fundamental Principles of our American System

of Constitutional Law and Government", Necessarily Includes a very broad diversity of "Religious

Views". Yet, at the very moment of the first examination of the Wide Diversity of "Religious Views";

our American People's already very emotionally-charged subject of our "Constitution" suddenly turns into

possibly the single most mutually dis-respectful, and potentially violent "Heated Debate" on the planet.

Why these "Religious Views" engender such "Heat", is a question which can at least temporarily be

considered a "Mystery". For the vast majority of this document's discussion, these "Religious Views"

In order for this study to progress in addressing all Secular American Constitutional Issues a

pragmatic, efficient, and secularly workable manner; some citations with at least a few strong "Religious

Views" will need to be referenced here-in. Thus, in this short section here, all Religious or Theological

concerns which at all need to be addressed in this document, will be addressed here in this "Religious"

section. These will not be addressed in detail, but merely for the limited purpose of clearly defining the

gate-ways between the religious and the secular realms.

It is necessary to make at least passing reference to these "Religious Views" because of the

existence of the phrase "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God", as it is used in the opening sentence of

our nations "Declaration of Independence". Mr Blackstone also used similar wording, clearly "Linking"

"Natural Law" with his concept of "God", as is shown by quotations presented from him later here-in.

These very reputable sources clearly affirmed that some concept of "God" was involved in all honorable

forms of "Constitutional Law and Government" during our nations constitutional inception.

This "Linkage" between "Religion" and "Natural Law" in our American System of Constitutional

Law and Government, is reflected in the ages-old and very physical, earthly, and secular Battle between

"Good vs Evil". At its more intense levels of discussion, this can be seen in how every nation on the

planet professes to be filling a "Natural Law" concern, when-ever they direct the force of their

nation/state to Separate those whom they identify as "Criminals" from the more Honorable People who

responsibly involving them-selves in their national communities. As a specific example, the policies of

the British monarch and his red-coats who pointed guns at our American Founders during our nations

"Revolutionary War", were "Evil". That Evil is precisely Why our early American Founders were

"Justified" in killing them. Every red-coat who was killed, then, was so killed through "Justifiable

Homicide". This is true because, just like the world-war two Nazis at Nuremberg those red-coats were

knowingly and willfully participating in "Evil Activities". Both the lower-level Nazis and the red-coats

made their spiritually-fatal moral-mistakes when they decided to mindlessly obey the orders of the evil

occupant of either Britain's throne or the Chancellorship of Germany.

To focus more tightly on the Fundamental Principles of "Natural-Law" involved in this concern,

unless there is a clearly-identified "Evil", then there is No "Justification" for authorizing the guns of the

nation/state to be pointed against any individual or group of people. "Evil" is the Only clear

"Justification" for pointing the guns of the nation/state at any living/breathing human-being. America's

Founders Sacrificed their Lives to Separate them and us (as their posterity) from those "Evil" red-coats,

and the other mindless and conscienceless drones of their corrupted British monarch.

As our nation's "Declaration of Independence" clearly indicates, our early American Founders

looked to these "Laws of Nature and of Natures God" for their personal guidance and direction, as they

courageously risked and frequently literally Sacrificed their very Lives, all so that our American

Constitutional concept of "Free Government" would be preserved for our modern society. Please note

the obviously similar root-meaning between the words "Sacrifice" and the religious word "Sacred".

Because the then-acting British Monarch, as the chief officer of their "Church of England" commanded

then to do so, some British red-coats believes that his commands were "Sacred". There-under; those redcoats

"Sacrificed" their lives, for their religious monarch. Conversely; our American Founders also

"Sacrificed" their lives, in their efforts to establish a better nation which they "Originally Intended" to

operate under their concept of "Natural Law". As the "Declaration" so clearly indicates, through the

words in its opening sentence of "and of Nature's God", the concept of America's Founders of "Natural

Law", was almost universally considered to be a "Religious" concept. And in the broader picture, there is

no reason why these heroic early Americans would "Sacrifice" their very Lives, unless they had some

form of "Sacred" or "Religious" Reason for doing so.

Through these words, this author believes that he has adequately shown to all conscience-bound

secular-humanists, atheists, or agnostics; that at least very powerful arguments can be made in support of

the proposition that the Founders of our once grand American Nation "Originally Intended" our American

Nation to exist in such a state of Harmony with supreme "Natural-Law" as to amount to a "Religious"

Ideal; and that, at least in very large part, that these "Religious Ideals" were preserved with-in our nations

written "U.S. Constitution" document.

Please note that the "First Amendment" was designed to prohibit favoritism from the civil

government towards any particular religious denomination. That First Amendment was not designed to

obstruct those particular Religious Institutions which might be very effective at Promoting "Natural-Law

based Social-Harmony" from influencing or even stepping into the complete vacuum of control of our

American Government. The ability of Natural-Law based Religious-Institutions to Positively Influence

American Constitutional Government was Purposefully Left "Wide Open". The specific wording of the

First Amendment is very clear on this point. The only possible grounds for objecting to "Religious

Influence" over our American Constitutional Government, is if that Religious-Institution is so influencing

"Establishment of Religion" prohibition in the First Amendment poses absolutely No Bar against

Organized "Religious Institutions" Influencing American Governmental Policy.

Having said this, there are two other points this author wishes to make before concluding this

section. First, probably all of the issues necessary to raise in order to lay an adequate legal foundation for

moving forward in pursuit of the goals sought though this and accompanying documents, have been

adequately covered through this brief discussion of these "Religious Issues", and through the remaining

and much more secularly focused larger body of the text of this document. Second, because all such

goals can be achieved through this largely secular focus of this document, there is no reason left to risk

alienating the conscience-bound secular-humanists, atheists, or agnostics, who in many ways can be seen

to be quite justified in their hatred of all things "Religious", because of the epidemic of corruption and

hypocrisy in most of the larger religious organizations. Indeed; many of these secular-humanists, atheists,

and agnostics, are actually more conscience-bound and more harmonious with supreme "Natural-Law"

than are a great many people who profess "Religion".

And so, in efforts to seek consensus with conscience-bound and reasonable people who identify

them-selves as secular-humanists, atheists, or agnostics; this author will vigorously seek to avoid all

further discussion of religious or theological concepts in this document. So please, all secular-humanists,

atheists, and agnostics, who possess functional-consciences; please indulge this author as he attempts to

lay a very broad-based foundation for this discussion. This document will seek to responsibly address

absolutely all of your legitimate concerns in terms harmonious with your solid secular/earthly firmlyfooted,

pragmatic real-world foundation. It is you who are framing approximately 96% of this discussion.

If you have a functional "Conscience", then the remaining heated "Religious Issues" will not be brought

in to the discussion until we have formed "Consensus" with you to move forward.

Our nations original “Articles of Confederation” did not make the arrogant claim as to be “The

Constitution” for this nation. That idea was “Invented” during the 1787 Philadelphia convention, by

powerful and self-serving people, in order to more effectively Entrench that Documents Status as a

“Supreme Governing Document” which Must Be "Blindly Obeyed" by the generally trusting common

American People, and by their Elected Representatives. It gave a theoretical Reason for Oppressive

Policies. “Because the Constitution Says So”, was to be the “Boiler-Plate Excuse” of the next generation

of governmental power-abusing aristocrats. There-under; “Reasoning”, in open and public forums, such

as court-rooms, was "No Longer Required".

In the Mad Rush to gain Colorable "Adoption" of that so-called "U.S. Constitution" document,

many passages were purposefully included there-in which contained specific words which were in

Conflict with other more honorable passages there-in. The indulgence of the "Slave-Trade" is one

example. In order to effect their military-like campaign with greater efficiency and speed, those same

Conspirators also Included Purposefully Ambiguous Terms in their so-called "U.S. Constitution"

document. This enabled them to more quickly and efficiently bamboozle the more honorable members of

that Convention into abandoning their natural opposition to the adoption of that power-centralizing

document. Thankfully; the more honorable members of that Convention not only insisted on numerous

more positive words being inserted into that document, but they also gained the insertion of numerous

complete passages and concepts there-in. How-ever; this resulted in a very chaotic and dis-organized

supreme national governing document; although thankfully, it did very significantly obstruct the "Hostile

Take-Over" Intent of the Conspirators.

Here-under; even under that largely corrupted written "U.S. Constitution" document; Many very

"Good Laws" can be found, mostly from the "Bill of Rights", which Authorize the Common American

People, and their Representatives, to use their Consciences and Reasoning abilities, to Effect Returns to

the More Fundamental, Principle-based, and Natural/Organic Laws upon which our nation was truly

founded. This is a Critically Important Point to remember; because that largely corrupted "U.S.

Constitution" document does not give concerned and true modern American Constitutionalists very much

wiggle-room to work in our efforts to effect returns to our truly "Fundamental American

Natural/Organic-Law".

And so; when examining the various conflicting Governmental Structural-Organization Concepts

and Social-Policies which may be found to have been included in that allegedly supreme national

governing document, it should be expected that continuing "Debate" Will Un-Fold concerning Which of

those Conflicting Organizational-Concepts and Social-Policies our nation's Governmental Office-Holders

and Body-Politic should Follow. Here-under, true patriotic Americans need to repeatedly and

emphatically Advocate Only those Few truly "Fundamental Principles" of our American Nation's supreme

written governing document which Actually "Work" to Secure "Justice", "domestic Tranquility" (Peace),

"common defense", "general Welfare", and "Liberty"; "for ourselves and our Posterity"; all as agreed in

that document's "Preamble" to be our American Nations "Constitutional Priority". Truly Honorable and

Patriotic Americans Must Actively Support Only traditionally recognizable "Workable-Pathways" for

Securing Justice, Safety, Peace, and Happiness for the larger Body-Politic of our Common American

People. This is the "Moral High Ground" up-on which All Truly Honorable and Patriotic Americans

Must Entrench.

It is worthy to note here that the adoption of the written so-called "U.S. Constitution" document

was, in large-part, a "Departure" from those traditionally-recognizable "Workable Pathways" for securing

Justice, Safety, and Peace, for the common people. This is true because our American People's

traditionally-recognizable Source of "Constitutional-Law" came from the nation of England. The vast

majority of the people who founded and established this nation were from England. Our Nation's

Founders already had laid down amongst them-selves a pre-existing and traditional body of Organic

"Constitutional-Law", which they Voluntarily "Consented to be Governed" by; because they all

recognized that this body of law was profoundly efficient at Securing Justice, Safety, and Peace, for themselves

and for their neighbors. These were the "Norms of Behavior" which they and their ancestors had

As under that old body of English Law; in modern England still, the word "Constitution"

indicates a "Generally Recognized Principle" or Socially-Organic "Moving Target"; similar to "Justice",

"Reasonableness", "Truth", or "Peace". In and of itself, no written document could reasonably boast to be

the full embodiment of those very high Principles. Under these General Principles of English Law, it

could be proper to declare a written document to be "Constitutional", because those words would simply

declare it to be "Truthful", "Peaceful", "Just" or "Reasonable". Similarly; America's Founders could

correctly apply all of those words to the "Declaration of Independence", and to the "Articles of

Confederation"; because those documents were traditionally-recognizable as being basically Harmonious

with these General and Fundamental Principles of Good Government.

But to claim that, in and of itself, any specific written document Was a "Constitution"; would be

similar to declaring that that document it-self Was "Truth", "Reason", "Justice", and/or "Peace". Under

these then generally-accepted Definitions of these English-Law based terms, such a bold proposition were

Not at all "Workable". The Heroes who Organized Americas Revolution did not dare to play any such

word-games with the documents which they were then asking their proud early American neighbors and

friends to "consent to be governed" by. Any such wording would be immediately and correctly have been

seen as being intended to un-justifiably thwart the ability of the various general community-counsels in

their ability to chart their own smaller community's path-ways of de-centralized responsible selfgoverning.

That was the precise essence of what they were all trying to get away from under the defacto

English monarch. At that point in time, any such use of the term "Constitution" to indicate a supreme

written governing document would have been suicidal for the individual leader so advocating it. Being

governed by such power-centralizing documents and policies would have been little different from

continuing to exist under the defacto English monarch. It certainly would not have been worth fighting

and dying for in the American Revolutionary War; merely there-after to be again be coercively governed

by the similarly un-reasonable, un-justifiable, and non-consent-based, power-centralizing policies which

would inherently be necessary, in order to enforce compliance with any such an allegedly supreme written

national governing document.

When it came time for the First American Heroes to compose a generally-issuing document

which articulated more clearly than the "Declaration of Independence", the general parameters with-in

which they envisioned the future "Free Government" for our nation to operate; their organic body-politic

of delegates assembled and composed our nations first formal governing document, which was entitled

the "Articles of Confederation". Like the "Declaration", the "Articles" honorably and responsibly

Continued along under the Same general body of Traditionally Recognizable "Fundamental Principles" of

un-written but justifiable and reasonable Organic "Constitutional-Laws" of "Free Government". These

were the Same "Fundamental Principles" which those First American Heroes had fought and died for in

the "Revolutionary War", in order to accomplish the end-goal of throwing-off the "Despotism" of the

defacto English Monarch, and there-after of securing their lasting general "Liberty" .

Both the "Declaration" and the "Articles" were little more than "Memorandums of

Understanding". As had already been clearly articulated in our nations organic/constitutional

"Declaration of Independence"; the "Articles" were firmly based on the concept of the "Consent of the

Governed". They were both designed essentially to be "Un-Enforceable Pledges" amongst "Honorable

Communities of Men", which Non-Coercively Obligated them, upon their Honor and general Reputations

in their communities, to act together for their own mutually-collective protection and benefit.

As the "Preamble" and the “Bill of Rights” clearly show, the Retaining of the "Pre-Existing

Fundamental-Law" was written into many specific Provisions of the written 1789 supreme national

governing document. Indeed, and as the above citations show; that document could not have framed any

logical-reasonable basis for its bold claim to be a “Constitution” for the people who organically compose

this nation, unless it retained at least some of these "Pre-Existing Fundamental-Laws". Examples of

Conflicts with those "Fundamental-Laws" are to be found in the poorly reasoned adoption of the “Bi-

Cameral Congressional-Assemblies” and the “Separation of Powers” Doctrine. Those doctrines can Not

be shown to be any part of these "Pre-Existing Fundamental-Laws"; which formed the basis of our

nations True Organic Anglo-American “Constitutional-Law”. They were then "Invented", just prior to

the 1787 - 1789 Conventions, and then sold to the American People, through one of the most highpressured

propaganda campaigns in our nations history.

How-ever; it is note-worthy that, in modern times, the authors of Black's Law Dictionary (which

does seem to make compromises in other areas) praise-worthily have continued to retain these more true

and honest Definitions of such critically important words as "Constitution". This citation, as quoted

below here-in; from this modern and reputable law-dictionary, shows clearly that the basic term

"Constitution" has not been changed by the adoption of the written "U.S. Constitution" document. If that

piece of paper document as composed in 1789, actually was "The Constitution" of our American nation;

then it would make no sense at all to refer to "Constitutional-Law" as "Organic-Law", as is done in the

"Black's Law Dictionary" citation above.

This indicates that America's Fundamental/Organic Law is still the Same as it was between 1776

and 1789! This indicates that, even under modern American "Constitutional Law", that any and all

specific provisions in that allegedly supreme written governing document which can be clearly proven to

be "In Conflict" with the Fundamental/Organic General-Principles of Law upon which our American

Nation was truly founded, are actually "Un-Constitutional", and they can and should be surgicallyremoved

there-from.

If one reviews the definitions of "Lex-Non-Scripta" and "Lex-Scripta" from "Black's Law

Dictionary", quoted above; it will be seen there-in that documents which purport to command the blindobedience

of men, are Not "Common-Law" Documents; but rather they may accurately be classified as

Roman-based "Civil-Law" Documents. This is true because commands of "Blind Obedience" are the

Central-Characteristic of the Roman-based "Civil-Law", as shown from the citations in the previous

chapter.

A bit of contemplation reveals that the Roman-based "Civil-Law", and its heavy reliance on

Written "Codes" of Human Conduct, are specifically Designed to Promote "Class Divisions". Hereunder;

there is a Larger general Confused Mass of Oppressed Population; and an opposing and

comparatively Small class of Well-Rewarded "Privileged People", an artificial and un-natural aristocratic

the artificial/un-natural aristocrats prefer for human society to be organized. Mechanisms such as this

have been in place since very ancient times, and the un-natural aristocracy prefers it to remain that way,

and written codes of human conduct are one of their most highly-evolved weapons for psychologicalwarfare

in convincing the confused masses that they must blindly obey the commands of the un-natural

aristocratic classes.

Under the "Articles of Confederation", the collective members of the General Congressional

Assembly could exercise both the Judicial and Executive powers. They could form Juries, follow ancient

common-law "Due Process of Law" to issue "Warrants of Arrest", and organize the "Peace Officers" and

Executive Personnel necessary to directly march there-from, so-as-to Execute any and all such arrest

warrants. This was obviously a very large amount of Power to be placed under the direct control of the

peoples elected delegates. They could move in any direction that "Due Process of Law" and the "Course

of Justice" might lead them. Un-Natural Aristocrat Classes, who were in the habit of pillaging and

plundering the common masses of the general population, might be held to an accounting at any time.

What-ever their defects, the un-natural aristocratic classes are not stupid. They could see the handwriting

on the wall. And so they organized to obstruct the empowerment of the peoples delegates, as it

then existed, under the "Articles of Confederation".

Here-under; close examination reveals that: that allegedly supreme written national governing

document was actually a "Compromise" between: the supporters of the truly Fundamental

Natural/Organic Principles for the Lawful Governing of our American nation; and some Powerful

"Private Interest Groups" which were Actively Hostile to those Natural/Organic Fundamental Principles.

This "Compromise" was proposed by these Powerful Hostile Forces, because they believed, correctly,

that once the American People became Alienated from those Fundamental Principles, then the American

People would become Easy Targets for the Schemes of of Pillage and Plunder which those Hostile Forces

had been seeking in legacy since ancient times.

Here-under; the main authors of the so-called Written "U.S. Constitution" document, as

composed in Philadelphia between 1787 and 1789, had become "Morally Compromised"; and thereunder,

they had under-taken to "Re-Define" the Pre-Existing Term "Constitution", in order to alienate it

from its Principle based Natural/Organic Common-Law Roots, and to give it a rigid, un-organic, and

Coercive implication. This activity was under-taken in closed-door and secretive session, out-side of

then-existing principle-based organic/fundamental "Constitutional-Law", all for the explicit purpose of

subjecting the American People to a form of Romanistic, Municipal Franchise-based Private-Interest-

Group Serving, Corporate Government; which could be used, slowly and incrementally, to progressively

escalate to higher and higher levels of pillage and plunder of the Organic Body-Politic of the American

People.

Further here-under; the Conspirators who were most powerfully-influential at the so-called

"Constitutional Convention", in 1787; sought to quickly, belligerently, and Lawlessly Rush-Through at

least a Colorable "Adoption" of their so-called "Constitution" document. Those Conspirators knew that

the more Honorable Delegates to that "Convention" were coming up-to-speed quickly in recognizing the

Conspirators "Malicious Intent", and there-under those more Honorable Delegates would soon begin

Organizing to successfully Resist their Conspiratorial scheme. Any such successful Resistance would

result in the Conspirators being forced from their positions of political power and wealth, and to then get

their hands dirty by doing honest labor, just like the rest of the American People. To them, that was

clearly an un-acceptable proposition. And so, those Conspirators were, self-servingly, in a Big "Rush" to

have their document "Adopted", Before the more Honorable Delegates of the People's States could

Organize any Opposition to their "Hostile-Take-Over" Scheme. Here-under, and with militarily-efficient

pre-planning, the entire Convention and Adoption of the so-called "Constitution" document, was

Lawlessly "Rushed Through", before potential opposition from the more honorable but under-prepared

delegates could be accomplished.

The entire subject of the Lawless Adoption of the 1789 Written "U.S. Constitution" document,

and of its conflicting relation with our nation's true natural/organic law and "Articles of Confederation"; is

not the subject of this document; and further detailed discussion is presented in an accompanying

document composed by this same author, and entitled “The Un-Constitutional Nature of the 'U.S.

Constitution" document.

The modernly fashionable habit of Regulating Social Behavior through Coercing People into

Following Civil "Statutes", causes the Honest Common People to who seek the protections of that socalled

“Law”, into being forced to go scurrying about to Lawyers and/or Judges, in their frantic Search for

authoritative Guidance and Direction in their very important legal decisions. In turn; those Lawyers

and/or Judges frequently merely open stature or case-law precedent citation books, to read some predetermined,

pre-formatted, and possibly obsolete solution to the current problem sought to be resolved.

The thought that the Common People might responsibly use their “Consciences” in conjunction

with their natural ability to “Reason” about how Sociological “Natural-Law” might apply to the current

situation, is usually not even considered. When a Society collectively forms a Heavy Reliance on those

Civil “Statutes” and Civil Case–Law “Precedent”, the Individual Members of that Society will

collectively and progressively Loose their collective ability to use their Consciences, and to Reason about

how the Higher “Natural-Law” should apply to their current sociological problems. And for those people

with Anglo-/American ethnic back-grounds, they will have forgotten the more fundamental and naturalorganic

"Rules of the Common-Law", “Due Process of Law”, and "Maxims of Law", which their

Ancestors successfully used for generations in achieving significant degrees of Harmony with the

Supreme Sociological “Natural Law”.

Modern Citations from Civil Statutes and civil judge-made case Precedents are possibly useful

Only in Aiding Juries in their Constitutional “Reasoning “ Duties. How-ever; such text-book based Civil

Citations s are of No Use if they advocate any form of the Limiting of the Parameters of the Solution-

Options or modes of procedure which are available to the local Juries or to their locally Elected Leaders,

when they seek to decide the Best Solution to the current problems pressing on their organic local bodiespolitic.

This begs the question of Why legislative assemblages then pass statutory enactments, by

majority-rule process, at all. The answer to that question is that they do so because they have been told to

do that, by our allegedly supreme written statute-law, deceptively mis-named as the “Constitution”. The

members of these legislative assemblies seem totally un-aware that the Best Source for Defining true

supreme “Constitutional-Law”, as well as for defining smaller issues of Law; is through the Consensus-

Building process of twelve common-law Jurors of good reputation in their local community, using their

Consciences and Reasoning Capabilities to arrive at “Unanimous Verdicts”.

**

How-ever; it is quite clear, from the citations contained here-in concerning the Anglo/Saxon's

“Witenagemote", that the "Norman Conquest” event Commanded Significant "Centralization of Power"

Away from anything remotely resembling the clearly documented more natural and organic process of

either the Anglo/Saxons or the Ancient Christian and/or Israelite Nation. In light of the fact that

“Government by Unanimous Jury” seems logically possible; and the fact that the only historical evidence

of anything resembling "Government by Jury" which has survived the history-falsifying of the Romanist

book-burners, is from the ancient Roman-Persecuted "Nation of Israel"; here-under, enlightened readers

should find "Just Cause" to “Presume” Against those Romanist slave-traders, and in favor of the surviving

significant circumstantial evidence that the Anglo/Saxon's “Witenagemote", and possibly even "King

Author's Round Table" were Governed by "Twelve Member Juries".

Governing by this “Unanimous Decision” policy is certainly much more “Reasonable” than is the

“Majority Rule” social behavior control guide-lines enacted by almost all modern civil legislative

assemblies. The use of those Majority-Rule Statutory Enactments do not actually serve any truly useful

Enactment" is given life-force through it's present intellectually-lethargic “Majority Rule” philosophy,

which is now in place almost every-where. The previously-mentioned “Consensus” is no longer sought

by congressional assemblages, as was traditionally required under our culture's ancient organic and unwritten

common-law based “Constitutional-Law”.

***

Prior to 1787, our American Constitutional System of Government had largely descended from

our “Mother Country”, the nation of Britain/England; and that nation had no written document which

made any such claim as to be “The Constitution”. When the British people speak of “Our Constitution”,

they are speaking of the general body of very slow-changing Fundamental-Principles of Organic

“Maxims of Law” which have traditionally been viewed as “Supreme Law” in governing the affairs of

their national body-politic. These principle-based fundamental “Constitutional-Law” policies, are all

firmly rooted in our mutually-shared tradition of Anglo/American “Common-Law”.

Further here-under, please note that; the more ancient and true pre-1066-ad English "Maxims of

Law", and the "Rules of the Common-Law" were brought into existence through the "Unanimous-

Verdicts" of Twelve-Member "Juries"; and that modern "Majority-Rule Statutes" from modern

Anglo/American Legislative-Assemblies are Not nearly so Worthy of Commanding the Obedience of the

Common People or Elected Representatives who are fashionably considered to be Governed by them.

For further insight on this point, please review the Difference between the "Malum-In-Se" and "Malum-

Prohibitum" forms of Legislation, as previously quoted here-in from "Black's Law Dictionary".

Under the parameters of these mutually-shared and principle-based "Maxims" of un-written

Anglo/American, Organic "Constitutional-Law"; the Elected Representatives of the common Constituent

People have to “Think” and “Reason” about how most responsibly to administer the affairs of

Organization of the General Assembly of the People's Elected Representatives, and the Modes of

Procedure to be followed there-in.

As an example of how a truly Organic/Constitutional "General Congressional Assembly" Should

Function; when the individual members of our American Body-Politics's Mechanical and Governmental

"Ship of State" are looking at a new problematic situation or case before them, and they are considering

how to apply any previously articulated or written solution to the problem to that case; then every one of

those previously expressed solutions should be considered merely as "Guide-Posts" along a well-worn

pathway or trail, or markings of danger on a map; in a darkened forest or a turbulent ocean of sociological

confusion. Our ancient organic Body-Politics's traditional "Common-Law" and "Maxims of Law" should

usually be strictly followed, like the Map for a Ship in moving through precarious and rock-infested

waters. Such a Map should be Obediently and Faithfully Followed at All Times, Except under the very

rare circumstances when meticulously well-reasoned "Just Cause" is "Shown" for taking the Gamble of

proceed along a different (and possibly entirely new, or "trail-blazing") pathway.

But again; when-ever seriously considering any such Diversion of our American Mechanical and

Governmental "Ship of State" form the Well-Charted Course of our ancestors along these traditional

Anglo/American "Maxims of Law"; All Governmental Agents (and especially Elected Representatives)

here-under have a "Organic/Constitutional-Duty", to their Constituents, to exercise Every Caution so-asto

Avoid the very real danger of the "Serious Sociological Disaster" which should Reasonably be Feared

from such a Diversion from that Well-Charted Course by our Nation's Mechanical/Governmental "Ship of

of-Law" have been Practiced over So Many Centuries, that, there are very few instances in which any

"Justification" can be found, for making any significant Diversion, from these traditional and well-settled

These Common-Law Guide-Posts in this darkened forest or turbulent ocean of confusion may

also be considered as "Statues", carved in marble, clearly marking the traditionally-recognized "Lawful

Path-Way" to follow, if sociological disaster is to be avoided. This concept of Statue-like Guide-Posts, in

a forest or ocean of sociological confusion, is believed by this author to be the ancient source of the word

"Statute". Here-under; "'Statutes" are Not "Laws"; but they are Merely Guide-Post-like "Advisory

Markers", which can be disregarded at any time or place, if "Just Cause" is Conclusively Shown for so

disregarding them.

Most modern American National and State “Civil-Government’s Statues” recognize this very

powerful "Justification" grounds, as a Legitimate Excuse for Disregarding their own Civil Statutes. For

example, in "Oregon Revised Statutes", the "Justification" Excuse is found in ORS 161.190, 161.195, and

is not sure precisely where those would be found. However, the "Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure" at

"Rule 2" governing "Interpretation" of these Rules, does declare that: "These rules are to be interpreted to

provide for the just determination of every criminal proceeding ..."; and other U.S. Code Statutes do

command much similar respect for the People's "Natural Rights", as are Secured by our Un-Written,

Organic Constitutional-Law. Most State "Rules of Criminal Procedure" and "Rules of Civil Procedure"

similarly declare that Seeking "Justice" is the Primary Goal of the proceedings in the court-rooms

governed by those rules.

So; even under modern National and State "Statutory-Law", Much "Justification" can be found

for Individual Americans using their Conscience and Reasoning Process, so-as-to Re-Chart the modern

Course of the modern "Ship of State" back along that Well-Mapped but presently lost traditional and

well-settled "Common-Law/Maxims-of-Law" Course, which was and is designed to secure Justice, Peace,

and Harmony with "Natural-Law", and which our Nation and its States have so disastrously diverted

from. ***

The manner in which this ancient "Due Process" was engineered was both benevolent and

militaristically "Disciplined". "Life and Death Decisions" were frequently necessary to be made through

this "Due Process of Law". This is how All Serious Controversies were anciently settled in these

"Common-Law Communities". These ancients knew well that any Less than Twelve Members in the

decision-making body would render it susceptible to Hostile Take-Over from Private Factions, while

More than Twelve there-in leads to Chaos, Confusion, and unnecessary Delay. Like the Twelve

Constellations of the Stars and the Zodiac, the Number "Twelve" was sufficiently large to represent all

legitimate interests in the universe of the subject which it is concerned with; yet still small enough to

collectively impose their own Self-Discipline, and there-by to Complete their Duty to their Community to

Peacefully and Promptly Settle the Argument before them, by arriving at a "Unanimous Declaration of

Law" in a reasonable time period.

Once these profound ancient concepts behind our Anglo/American Constitutional Ideas of "Due

Process of Law" and "Common-Law" are fully comprehended; it is reasonable and logical (lawgical) to

conclude that: with-in the truly "Lawful Parameters" of our "American Constitutional System of

Government"; "all 'Majority Rule' Decision-Makings (whether forth-coming from 'Legislative

Assemblies', 'Supreme Courts', or any other "Majority Rule" decision-making bodies); are Not "Lawful".

Do The Math. When focused on the "Fundamental Principles" of our American Constitutional System of

Government, in a Tightly and Militaristically Disciplined Manner; the fashionable "Majority Rule"

practice among the the "US Congress" of passing "Legislation", and the "US Supreme Court" of

rendering "Judgements", is "Lawless"!

Specifically; in order for True American Constitutional “Law” to allow for any of the modernly

fashionable of "Majority Rule" Declarations of the "U.S. Legislative Assembly" or the "U.S. Supreme

Court" to also be considered at all a part of the "Single Voice" of that True American Constitutional

"Law"; the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments would have to be Abolished. This is true because

those amendments make Specific Reference to the Pre-1776-Definitions of that Superior "Due Process"

and "Common-Law", both of which Require "Unanimous Jury Verdicts". The Ninth and Tenth

Amendments also strongly imply support of this same "Due Process" and “Common-Law”, and similar

arguments can be made for support from many of the other amendments. This Scientific Common-Law

"Due Process" is so entrenched on our American Constitution Document's "Bill of Rights"; that in order

for the advocates of class-warfare malum-prohibitum based coercive societies to successfully make any

colorably lawful circumvention of it, they would first have to complete the Surgical Removal of a Clear

Majority of the provisions of that "Bill of Rights".

Such bold steps are unlikely to occur. And if such circumvention of the “Bill of Rights’ ever did

colorably occur, it would still not change the pre-existing Natural-Law based Definition of "Law"; and so

those changes could only be implemented through brute-force and superior physical-power. And as every

fiber of our American Constitutional System of Government clearly bears witness, Mere "Power" is Not

the Source of our American Nation's true Constitutional "Law".

(Reserved for expansion of discussion, in later versions of this document)

In this study, a very significant point needs to be kept in mind, in order to fully comprehend Why

this 'Natural-Law' Philosophy is modernly considered to be so un-fashionable. The main point to grasp

here is that since ancient times, and clearly from the start of our American nation, there has existed and

continues to exist a Powerful and Hostile “Private Interest Group” which has relentlessly and

purposefully Conspired to Obscure these very powerful 'Natural-Law' ideas from reaching into the minds

and hearts of our American people. This powerful private interest group is both Religious and Evil in its

essential nature; and through-out all of its history it has relied on one form or another of the Slave Trade

for its economic power-base. This powerful and evil private interest group believes that they need to

obscure the historical realities of the ancient system of "Free Government", which has been passed down

to our Anglo American People through our ancient Anglo/Saxon and Israelite History. They believe that

they need to do this, because, if our American People discover the true realities of how grand the ancient

Common-Law Model of "Free Government" can be, then these American People will summarily reject

the multitudes of the false-dichotomies which the powerful Evil Conspirators have artificially set-up over

us. There are two documents in accompaniment here-to which explain this conspiracy in much more

detail, and which are entitled: “The Un-Constitutional Nature of the Written 'U.S. Constitution'

Document”, and also “The Artificial/Lawless/DeFacto Overlay in the United States Government”.

As implied by that first documents title, argument is made there-in that the written “U.S.

Constitution” document is Not in Lawful Compliance with these deeper organic principles of

document builds to show how from that original lawless foundation, “breeding-ground” has been

cultivated for powerful aristocratic parasite classes to pillage and plunder the common American People.

A future document is planned by this author which will explain in much more detail the deeper

depths of this conspiracy of evil, how it has always been dependent on some form of slave-trading, and

how they have Burned Books and Falsified History in order to Limit our "Legal Memory" of our grand

Anglo, Saxon, Celtic, Germanic, Nordic, Israelite History of this Natural-Law based "Responsible Self-

Governing" process.

Those issues will not be explored in this document, but heavy reference will be made to those

documents, and they should be consulted by the reader as needed. This author needs to state this

"Conspiracy" proposition out front, so that other elements of this entire article will fit together, piece by

In ancient England, prior to the so-called "Norman-Conquest of 1066-ad"; there was a

governmental system in place which (although admittedly significantly "less than perfect"), was then

governing the people of that land in a manner substantially in harmony with Sociological "Natural-Law".

This Natural-Law based System of Government found its even more ancient roots in ancient

Israel. Among other sources numerable; William Blackstone admitted the truth of this proposition, in his

classical and powerfully authoritative "Commentaries on the Laws of England"; which reads as follows:

Honest historical, legal, and political researchers, will surely recognize that the above very

authoritative text has seemingly just shown how two seemingly entirely different bodies of "Law",

spanning approximately 3100 years of human history (then), are both still recognizably "Linked-

Together". As Mr Blackstone indicates, the history of our Anglo/American Constitutional System of

Government, Reaches Back 3400 years (now) into a Christian/Israelite tradition, as set forth in a passage

recorded in the Biblical/Torah book of Exodus 18: 14-26; which reads as follows:

This verse shows that the Government of the ancient Israelite Nation was directed through its

"Torah-Law" to adopt a permanently "De-Centralized" system governing. This "Torah/Law" commanded

the Israelite people to "Responsibly Self-Govern" by way of permanently Sup-Dividing their Nation's

Government's collective Judicial Power, all down through a Deep-Hierarchy, into basically very small

Ten-Household Unit Communities. For those seeking additional evidence; this general Torah/Biblical

Commandment, with its deep-hierarchy of de-centralized responsible self-governing communities, is

repeated in Deuteronomy, 1: 13-17.

As the student of history attempts to trace "the slender thread of political and legal thought" from

ancient Israel into its more modern manifestations, some very suspicious coincidences appear. About 400

years after the death of Israel's Messiah/Christ Jesus/Yeshuah, and the soon there-after Roman

destruction of Jerusalem, suspiciously, the same laws of Israel are being practiced in the northern

European area which is modernly known as Germany. These people are practicing a system of decentralized

responsible self-government very similar to that practiced in ancient Israel. From the

following citation and quotation, Israel is not specifically mentioned; but the parallels should be obvious

to the modern reader of this document.

This citation, from the then popular and reputable "Little, Brown, and Company", of Boston, by

Mr "Henry Adams"; shows clearly the de-centralized political-dynamic involved at the very historical

roots of our Anglo/American "Common-Law" System of De-Centralized Constitutional Government. It

shows in particular how our American concept of "States" is firmly based on this Anglo/Saxon/Germanic

system of "Common-Law"; which "Common-Law States" in turn are shown to have passed from those

people in Ancient Germany, to the English Ancestors of our American People. Please note, in Mr Adams

text, here-in is declared, in Paraphrased Summary, that:

Please note the Recurring Reference to the American concept of the "State", and to its "Ordinary

Sub-Division" called the "Hundreds". Please note also that these Germanic common-law Assemblies

were functioning in times surrounding the "later half of the fifth century", or in the later ad-400's. Please

note also that the Hierarchy of Moses, as described previously in Exodus & Deuteronomy, included the

similar "Ordinary Sub-Division" of the Israelite State, known as the "Hundreds". These "Hundreds" had

then existed for about 1700 years. Moses time was in about 1300-bc, and this time was in about 450-ad.

The Exodus/Moses Hierarchy Similarly Describes Smaller Localized Communities of the

nation/state "Administering Justice" for them-selves, in their own communities, courts, and popularassemblies

of the common people; all according to each of their own standards of conscience and fairplay.

If anything, the later Germanic/Anglo/Saxon Communities are documented here-in as being even

more De-Centralized, Independent, and "Responsibly Self-Governing", than were the more ancient

Israelite People of the Biblical/Torah Text (whom are still believed by many people to be "Gods Chosen

People"). Clearly; the Similarities between these two ancient cultures is very significant.

Please note also how this text documents that these Germanic/Anglo/Saxon Communities "clung

with ... (sturdy) independence (and) ... tenacious conservatism to their ancient customs and liberties".

This text indicates that, back in ad-450 or so, that these customs of these Germanic/Anglo/Saxon

Communities were Then "Ancient"; and that the people practicing these "Customs", believed in them so

strongly that they "Clung" to them with "Tenacious Conservatism" and "Sturdy Independence". The

complete quote, even explains how, when conquered by a foreign power, these people usually continued

on in practicing their "Ancient Customs and Liberties". These people clearly must have believed in these

"Ancient Customs and Liberties" very Strongly and "Tenaciously".

Please now recall from Mr Adams above quoted text, that these Germanic/Anglo/Saxon

Communities of People " settled upon the south-eastern coast of England during the later half of the fifth

century". This is all "Well-Documented History". Numerous other sources besides this text document

clearly that the Anglo-Saxon Races who eventually became the largest percentage of the Population of

England, had Migrated From Germany during these earlier years. No serious scholar on this subject

questions these well-established historical facts.

Further, and similarly; in the 1600's & 1700's, these Same People of Anglo-Saxon England

Migrated to form the base-population of what has modernly become our "United States of America".

Again; this history is such a common-knowledge "Historical Fact", that it's finer points will be presumed

here-in to have been clearly established, and further argument in support of these "Historical Facts" will

be deemed to be recognized by all parties concerned here-with.

At this point it is good go back and re-consider the previously-quoted and other-wise strange

words from Mr Blackstone; which read, in Paraphrased Summary part, as follows:

Here is shown the reputable Mr Blackstone referring to the "Ancient Constitution" of England

(which necessarily includes its traditional "Common-Law", all as has been well-documented to be the

basis of our American Constitutional System of Law and Government, and which will be illustrated more

fully here-in). Here, near 1750-ad or so; Mr Blackstone is making "Clear Linkages" between the Torah-

Laws of Israel's Ancient "Jewish Republic", and England's "Ancient Constitution". Mr Blackstone is here

again clearly Forging Linkages between England's Constitutional "Little Courts" where-in "Injuries were

Redressed ... by ... neighbors and friends", and Israel's sub-divided smaller self-governing "Courts" of the

"Hundreds".

The Obvious Similarities between these two systems of de-centralized responsible self-governing,

where Mr Blackstone describes for England's Ancient Constitution, and Mr Adam's text explaining the

much earlier system of de-centralized responsible self-governing which was practiced by the

Anglo/Saxon peoples of Germany near the ad-450 time mark, is clearly to much to be a mere

"Coincidence". Clearly; England's Ancient Constitution, as it existed in the ad-1750's or so, came, at least

in very large part, from the Germanic Anglo/Saxon Peoples "Ancient Customs and Liberties",

approximately 1300 years earlier, in ad-450 or so. This very important point will be shored-up by

frequent references to it in future discussion presented in this document.

The fact that the Anglo/Saxon peoples of Germany migrated in the ad-450's or so to form the

general population of later England, is not really any significantly new piece of data in the larger puzzle

sought to be explored in this document. It is fairly easy to document these historical facts in common

historical text-books. The data which is Significant, is the fact that those ancient Anglo/Saxon peoples

were so very significantly Organized, in their De-Centralized and Responsible Self-Governing Smaller

Communities of People; and the very Clear Linkages between their de-centralized system of Governing,

and the 1300-year earlier system of Governing in ancient Israel. These ancient Germanic/Anglo/Saxon

Peoples of approximately 450-ad, were Not the great-mass of un-washed, constantly-warring

"Barbarians" which the modern mind has so very erroneously and suspiciously come to picture them as.

Those ancient Germanic Anglo/Saxons practiced a form of de-centralized "Responsible Self-Governing"

which is so profound that it is difficult for the modernly conditioned American mind to fully contemplate.

Under such modern concepts as Sociological "Natural Law", and in terms of securing the related Peace

and Happiness of the Common People; that Anglo/Saxon/Germanic System of de-centralized responsible

self-governing may properly be considered to be head and shoulders "Superior" to its then only

competing system of governing, which was that of the power-centralized and constantly land-hungry and

And so, to look a the large picture again; these recently-quoted citations begins to fit well with

the more modern American citations presented earlier; which, at first glance, may have seemed

impossible to believe. However, and in this new light; these other-wise very controversial citations now

may be examined more closely for any true merit contained there-in. For example; the previously quoted

"Black's Law Dictionary" Definition of our American Constitutional concept of the "State"; which

presented here now again, in part, reads as follows:

When this citation was first presented above; it may have seemed a large jump of logic to

presume our American Constitutional Concept of the "State" was firmly "Linked" to our ancient

Anglo/Saxon history of "Common-Law". But the immediately preceding text form the "Essays on

Anglo/Saxon Law" book, by Mr Adams; clearly indicated that this "Linkage" is quite Justified by the

very real History behind this entire study. And actually, if the student will contemplate the entire matter

for a moment, there really is no other logical explanation. For example; Mr Blackstone indicated earlier,

concerning the Laws and Courts of ancient Israel, that: this general system of Courts and accompanying

Body of Law "Still Continues" under our generally recognized Anglo/American "Legal-Constitutional"

System of Governing.

This De-Centralized System of People's Courts and Law, of which Mr Blackstone speaks, is

modernly more well-defined and traditionally-recognizable as simply “Common-Law”. The only way

these ancient Laws of Israel and of the Germanic Anglo/Saxons could have survived into Blackstone's

1750's England, would have been through a Community of People who "tenaciously" and continuously

practiced them, over these lengthy time-periods.

To summarize: Our entire modern Anglo/American "Common-Law" system of "County" and

"Precinct" Government is firmly intertwined with and linked to: the smaller responsible self-governing

communities which existed back 3400 years ago, in ancient Israel and in the times of Moses, as the

"Hundreds". Many people will surely find this assertion to audacious to embrace into their personal

belief system. Yet this is precisely what the very reputable Mr Blackstone has so stated. And in further

support there-of; the text of the Biblical/Torah passages, referring to these communities organized by the

"Hundreds", are quite clear for everyone to review. Further; even modern law dictionaries show very

powerful evidence that this very same 3400 year old system of government is at the very root of our

modern American County, Precinct, and Township system of "Common-Law Government". Here-under;

it is good here to Search for additional "Linkages" (if they truly exist) between our modern

Anglo/American system of Organic "Constitutional Law and Government", and this 3400 year-old text in

Exodus and Deuteronomy which references these responsible self-governing communities of the

"Hundreds". And so, it is good now to examine such fashionably respected modern authorities as

follows:

Among other and broader purposes, these citations have been chosen in efforts to examine them

for any possible "Linkages" between this Anglo/Saxon system of laws and governing, and the ancient

Israelite system of governing under the Biblical Torah-Law. These citations have also been chosen to

illustrate how, in older times, the entire Body of Law and the Organization of Anglo/Saxon Society in

England was profoundly focused on the smaller responsibly self-governing communities known as the

"Hundreds".

Here-under; it is good to note from these citations, that, the immediately smaller jurisdiction

which collectively composed each such "Hundred" is also immediately jurisdictionally above the

individual Households. This Smaller Anglo/Saxon common-law unit of localized Self-Government is and

was known as the “Township”. These "Townships" originally consisted of approximately "Ten Families"

or Households. The above citations, from this reputable source, clearly illustrate these historical facts. In

large part, just from these sources (other sources not presented here-in because of space & time

constraints); the words “Town”, "Ten", "Tenant", "Tenure", and “Tithing”; can all be seen to be

"Related". The Economic Support for the entire ancient nation of England was Voluntarily Collected by

and/or “Constable” of that Township. In other words, their Tax-Collector and their Cop/Policeman, and

he was a Directly "Elected" Member of Their Own Community of approximately 10-household-members.

This "Peace Officer" was also each Township's local-jurisdictional "Spiritual Leader". This

"Spiritual Leader" was not a "pansy", like are most modern spiritual leaders. Rather; he was entirely

capable of confronting death, as he lead the able-bodied men of his community into battle, even against

opposing odds. This is how True "Spiritual-Leaders" function. They are ready to confront death on

behalf of the people whom they heroically volunteer to defend. His Election by the Community Members

gives him this "Natural Right" to claim "Royalty", and to demand "Tithing Donations", until it hurts. He

has the Right and Duty to command the full position of the "Spiritual Leader" of their community. He is

a "Mentor", or "Role -Model" for the Young Men, and he is the Repository of Safety and responsible

Trust for the Old Men. He Organized the Able Bodied Men of the Community to Defend the entire

Community with "what-ever force is necessary". The communities who elected these men, from their

own ranks, to defend their communities, were obligated to give these men this recognition, because those

communities Constantly Depended on these men to Defend their Community from the out-side/out-law

aggressors. That is why they are called by the related term "Constable", because they are "Constantly"

there, Defending Their Community.

As the above citations also show; the common-law self-governing unit known as the “Precinct”

consisted of approximately a “Hundred” Families or Households, which are composed of approximately

Ten Townships each. Each such "Precinct" had and has the right to Elect their Own Judges, who have

traditionally been called the “Justice of the Peace”, or the "Precinct Capitan" ; and who exercised Judicial

as well as Executive functions. Although documentation is thin, these chief officers of each of these

jurisdictions were probably subjected to "Immediate Recall", from the Town Constables who lead each of

the smaller Townships which composed the Precinct. Here-under; problems with conspiracy by Precinct

Captains to abuse the governmental power with which they were entrusted must have been very rare. In

fact this "Hundred Court" or "Precinct Court" was merely an Assembly of the Town Constables, who

gathered there-in to collectively assist each other in "Administering Justice", maintaining the Peace; and

discussing smaller collective township business as road maintenance. "Service to God", as they

conceived him, was probably also a very significant activity there-in.

Calls for "Votes of Confidence" in the previously-elected Leader of their Hundred/Precinct

Court/Assembly probably could be submitted before the Assembly at any time. Such calls could be

resolved, and new leadership elected (if so collectively decided to be best), all in a very quick and

efficient manners. Each leader of each immediately larger jurisdiction in this entire Common-Law

Hierarchy was probably subject to such a "Vote of Confidence", at any time in which the leaders of the

smaller jurisdictions which composed it decided that a hearting on that matter was justified. This is a part

of the genius of this deep-hierarchy torah-law/common-law arrangement. Here-by, each of these

governmental jurisdictions only has enough sub-divisions of it's own general body, so that each of the

elected leaders of the smaller sub-divisions involved in any specific jurisdiction has full opportunity to

exercise what amounts to a "Veto Power" over any specific leader, or his policies.

The "Hundreds" of "Hundred Courts" of this ancient torah-law/common-law system of

governing, are specifically mentioned in early American colonial writings. By way of the "Social

Compact" which the approximately ten-townships of each precinct had entered into; whenever the wellarmed

people of any individual township faced any kind of organized attack from any group of hostile

criminals which they could not safely handle by themselves, the Terms of their Social-Compact obligated

them to send "Hue and Cry" to their "Precinct Captain" or "Justice of the Peace"; and through him to the

remaining "Town Constables"; so that all members of their Precinct could quickly and efficiently be

mobilized to come to the armed defense of the Township which was being attacked.

And our better known common-law jurisdiction of the "Counties" consisted of approximately a

Thousand Families or Households; and it was sub-divided into approximately Ten "Precincts", or

"Hundred Courts". The chief officer of those Counties has gone by different names in the past, but

American Constitutional-Law generally recognizes him as the "County Judge", or the "Count"; and the

"County Sheriff" was little more than his courts "Sergent at Arms". When all of the armed men of the

approximately Ten Precincts got together, they formed a small army, which is still known modernly as

"Posse Comitatus", and which was quite capable of defending against very formidable foes.

The "Counties", “Precincts”, and “Townships”, in England and early America were originally

Constitutionally Organized with Full Lawful Authority, Right, and Duty, to Form Their Own “Courts of

Justice”, and "Try" All Crimes which have been committed in Their Geographical Jurisdiction. Their

only requirement is that they follow basic American Constitutional "Due Process of Law", which is also

known as “the Rules of the Common-Law”, as the "Seventh Amendment" so clearly and profoundly

declares.

These historical insights all merge well with the last Black's Law Dictionary citation given above,

defining the "Witenagemote". This word was used to describe the general "Congressional Assembly" of

these times. This "Witenagemote" was organized as a very efficient "Unicameral" Congressional

Assembly, so that it could quickly and efficiently come to make the decisions necessary for responsibly

Anglo/Saxon "Witenagemote" Congressional-Assembly was able to operate in this more quick and

efficient manner, because the people it governed possessed functional tools for holding there delegates to

some form of effective accountability. From the above description, and other testimony; this ancient

Unicameral Assembly also exercised the "Judicial Power", and it probably also exercised effective control

over the "Executive Power" of the Monarch, as well. This is all very similar to how affairs were

conducted in the "General Congress Assembled", as mentioned in the first United States Supreme

Governing Document, entitled simply and properly as the "Articles of Confederation". That fine

governing document ran for approximately thirteen years, prior to the 1789 alleged adoption of the

written so-called "US Constitution" document.

When the two systems are compared, side-by-side, in non pre-judged manners; the nonprejudicial

student of the subject will clearly recognize the vast Superiority of the earlier Anglo/Saxon

and Israelite Models for organizing National Congressional Assemblies, for achieving true Peace among

the individual members of the community, and Harmony with broader Sociological "Natural-Law". As

will be explored further here-in; the Modern Anglo/American Congressional Assemblies at such

significant Divergence from the our mutually-shared "Fundamental Principles of Constitutional-Law and

Government" that they may properly be labeled as being "Constitutionally-Lawless". When viewed in

contrast with the more Sociological "Natural-Law" way of Anglo/Saxon/Israelite Governing, the current

mode of organizing our various Congressional Assemblies, is so very dysfunctional, that it seems to

embrace criminality.

***

This precise "Jury Trail" Process has been in use, off and on, for probably more than 2,000 years.

Related common-law process can be traced back 3,400 years; as shown earlier here-in. This ancient

“Jury-Trial” Process has resulted in a History of Natural-Law based Decisions which are still modernly

known as "Maxims of Law", and as the "Rules of the Common-Law". Harmony with this Sociological

"Natural-Law" is consistently the logical result of these Jury Trails, because: it is very difficult to get

twelve people to agree on anything; and once that impressive task has been achieved, presumption can

then be justifiably made by everyone concerned with the issue, that harmony has there-by been achieved

with Higher Sociological “Natural-Law”. Here-after; the case-law precedents based on these Unanimous

community-based Jury decisions, can properly be defined as “Law”.

This is the true ancient source of “Common-Law”; and, at the larger jurisdictional levels, these

twelve-person Juries can be assembled from the delegates sent to meet in the General "Congressional

Assembly" to follow “Due Process of Law”, as any current situation facing that assembly might require.

This is probably how the Twelve Tribes of Ancient Israel were governed, as indicated in the Biblical

Book of “Numbers”, chapter 1. And because Jesus/Yeshuah respected that pre-existing “Torah-Law”, it

is probably how the Twelve Disciples s of Jesus governed the early Christian Church. It is probably how,

prior to he evil “Norman Conquest” of 1066 ad, the rulers of England governed their national affairs.

King Arthur's legendary “Round Table” was probably configured precisely to achieve this “Unanimous

Verdict”, from twelve separate self-governing jurisdictions. Please see the references to the

Anglo/Saxon's “Witenagemote", as quoted here-in from "Black's Law Dictionary", and other sources.

Open-minded research into all of these historical government-related areas, shows much evidence

for presuming that it was through the use of these Twelve-Member Consensus-Based Juries that these

ancient communities were governed. Probably the single best evidence of this fact, which has survived

the hostile history falsification from the book-burning jurisdiction of the Romanist slave-traders, is the

well-known fact hat Jesus/Yeshuah of the Bible set-up the early Christian Church in efforts to Govern the

Nation of Israel through a Twelve Member Governing Body. Further; in the Torah-Law of the Old-

Testament, in the Book of "Numbers", in the first chapter, is clear indication that "Twelve Princes" from

the Twelve Tribes of Israel" had significant say in the governmental policies of that Israelite Nation. It is

this authors opinion that it is clear that Christ/Messiah Jesus/Yeshuah was clearly attempting to remain

Faithful to the older “Torah-Law” when he set up his Kingdom for the Governing of Israel. This author

further believes , that, this is the precise Reason Why the Roman Slave-Traders and their Judas-goat

quislings, the Pharisees, conspired to murder him. This is true, because, if the People learn how to

“Responsibly Self-Govern”, then the People will Organize Their Own Armed Defense, and they will

Throw-Off the Chains of Tyranny. That, in turn, will cause the Slave-Traders to have to go out and find

honest work, because they will soon run out of people to en-slave.

These Biblical texts seem to have miraculously survived the ages-old purposeful destruction

agenda of the Romanist slave-traders conspiracy. But it seems that the true records of how the

Anglo/Saxon's “Witenagemote" was governed, possibly by a Twelve Member Jury, have been effectively

purged from the historical record by the invading slave-trading Romanistic armies of "William the

Conqueror" in the "Norman Conquest" of 1066-ad. This author likes to theorize that "King Author's

Round Table" may have been configured around a similar Twelve Member Governing Body as that which

also seems to have been used at different times in ancient Israel. I believe this is why the legends of

“Camelot” invoke such visions of grandeur. However; because of the massive book-burnings at the Point

of the Romanist/Normanist Swords, the true reality on that point History may never be known.

Frequently; after people finally acknowledge the Superiority of Localized Community-Based

"Natural Law" and Responsible Self-Governing Process, as being superior over the various Romanistic

"Malum-Prohibitum" based forms of Provisional Governmental Social-Engineering Schemes; there still

remains the objection that these Communities will still Need Some Person or Group of People to

"Declare" What Is "Natural-Law" for that community.

Since ancient times, the singular mode of procedure which makes any sort of reasonable claim to

be able to accomplish this task has been through the smaller and more local communities choosing their

own "Common-Law Juries". These twelve "Common-Law Jurors" were lawfully required to be Selected

Form the People who were generally recognized in their local communities to be of "Good Reputation",

and they also had to pledge up-on their honor to Deliberate in Good-Faith, until they achieved a

"Unanimous Verdict", with regard to the controversy before them.

Harmony with Sociological "Natural-Law" can Only be Achieved, consistently, through such a

Consensus-based and "Unanimous" Decision-Making Process as this. "Majority Rule" decision-making,

as is modernly so fashionable practiced, is the tool of oppressors and tyrants. There is No Justifiable

Reason to not seek these Consensus-based Decisions, as are readily available, if one has come to a full

comprehension of the profound sociological advantages to be had from following basic traditional

"Common-Law Jury-Trial" Process.

When it is fully comprehended how this Consensus-based "Jury Trail" process was actually

functioning in these ancient grass-roots, de-centralized, and communities; it will become obvious that the

Leaders; who were to serve in the Larger Jurisdictions Over these Smaller Communities, were also

chosen through a "Consensus" -based process. In pre-1066-ad Norman-Conquest England, and Under the

"Articles of Confederation" in early America, very large portions of this "Consensus" -based Decision-

Making and Leadership Selection Process, was in place; especially at the smaller and more localized

levels of governing.

Here-under; when "Unanimous Verdicts" were rendered concerning what Social Policies should

be Enforced as "Law" in their communities; the Roots of these Twelve Jurors, as People of "Good

Reputation" in their communities, furnished significant tangible "Evidence" that the local people in those

communities considered the "Unanimous Verdict" which was rendered through those Juror's Judgement

to be based firmly on a form of Conscionable, Reasonable, and Socially-Organic "Natural Law". Even

today, the Jurors Role is to Function as the "Conscience of the Community". "Conscience" and

"Consensus" are clearly "Related Terms".

This all left very little social-engineering for the officers of central government to be burdened

with. These local Common-Law Communities were basically very self-sufficient and happy with-out any

such micro-managing; and because the people back then were sufficiently in touch with their true

natural-organic needs, that this was universally recognized by every-one to be in the best interests of the

entire nation. These ideas are discussed more later in this document.

But the main point here is that it is Only through Obtaining such effective Evidence of the

“Consent” of the Local “Constituents”, as has traditionally been done through following this ancient

Anglo/American Common-Law "Trial by Jury" process; can the truly “Organic Needs” of any natural

living-breathing Organic “Body-Politic” of People be meaningfully and functionally addressed. In more

Organic terms; in order for any body of social behavior guidelines to be “Constitutional”, these guidelines

must enable the Collective Spirit of the Common “Constituent” People to “Come Together” in a “General

Congressional Assembly”, so that they may Collectively Address their own larger collective organic

“Body-Politic's” Natural/Organic Needs.

Here-under; People from Out-Side of any particular Community, benevolent or other-wise, are

Not capable of “Providing” this truly defined “Constitutional Law” for the People whom they might claim

authority to govern. True “Constitutional Law” is established Only through the solemn and un-rushed

deliberations of "The People" them-selves, in their own smaller and responsibly self-governing

communities; or through similar general-assemblages of their honorably elected and faithfully

accountable "Representatives". This True Organic and Fundamental form of “Constitutional-Law” is

Universally Applicable to every nation on earth, including our own USA.

Please note from the above definition of "Witenagemot", that this governing body was simply a

"Grand Council of the Kingdom", that sometimes "the body Met Without Notice", and that it was with-in

their power to "Elect a New King". Note that "subsequently to the Norman Conquest it was called ...

finally 'parliament'; but it’s character had become considerably changed, (and) that a Very Extensive

Equity Jurisdiction (was) exercised. ... It passed out of existence with the Norman Conquest, and the

subsequent Parliament was a separate growth, and not a continuation of the Witenagemot".

These words show clearly how the largely De-Centralized "Common-Law Government" which

was originally working in England, in its more ancient and optimal Anglo/Saxon/Israelite modes, was

Significantly Altered during this 1066-ad "Norman Conquest" event. Some further citations which

provide much-needed breadth to the larger picture of this Critically-Important Turning-Point in our

Anglo/American Organic-Constitutional History, read as follows:

All of these citations, taken together, collectively Prove the existence of a widely practices and

"Natural-Law" based System of Social Government which originated at least as far back in time as 3400

years ago, in the times of Moses, under the Biblical and Torah based Laws of the true Nation of Israel.

This 3400 year old body of Natural-Law and Torah-Law based Governing was basically a true and

honestly workable system of De-Centralized and Localized "Responsible Self-Governing"; and somehow,

it had Survived the hostile influence of the powerful Roman Empire, and Survived as a workable

system of Governing in-to ancient England, at least up until the so-called "Norman Conquest" of 1066-ad.

Further, the Survival of the practice of these Torah-Laws of Israel in ancient England seems to be owed to

"Christian Rulers".

It is of critical importance to note that, in terms of "the History of Human Freedom", this entire

1066-ad “Norman Conquest” event was an immensely Tragic Event; because, that 1066-ad event Marked

the End of the comparatively Pure Practice of these Torah-based Natural-Law in human society on this

planet. Yet curiously; the existence of this Natural-Law based Governing Model, its Israelite Torah-Law

History, and its Purposeful Destruction at the time of this 1066-ad event, all seems to be Purposefully

who are honest about it, will not contest the accuracy of the general proposition set forth here-in, that

Profound Fundamental Change Against De-Centralized, Popularly-Supported, and "Participatory"

Government, was Instituted in England during this so-called "Norman Conquest" of 1066-ad.

To be clear, the pre-existing Anglo-Saxon methods of responsibly “Self-Governing” were less

than perfect, as they themselves were invaders from the Germanic nations, hundreds of years earlier,

around 450-ad or so. But they shared the same basic and general methodology of de-centralized selfgoverning

as were used by the Celts, Brits, and other cultures then in the area. As a direct result, when

their localized invasions were completed; the communities of people who were over-taken, were not

nearly so disastrously oppressed, as what occurred under the totally different, foreign and sociologically

un-organic, top-down, authoritarian, control-oriented Romanistic system, which was imposed over all of

those communities at the time of that 1066-ad "Norman Conquest" event.

Here-under, the Anglo-Saxon culture of Britain had effectively preserved the basic older and truer

forms of sociologically-organic "Natural-Law" and "Torah-Law", as it had survived under the kindred

cultures of the Brits, Celts, and other clan/tribe nation/state communities. The vast majority of the history

of this ancient de-centralized Natural-Law mode of Governing are a true delight to read.

As the above citations show, the Disastrous 1066-ad "Norman Conquest" event instituted a

system of slavery over the American Founders Anglo/Saxon Ancestors. Literally, the very Fabric of

Anglo/Saxon Society was Ripped Apart during that event. These realities are shown by the following

citation:

Please note that the "Shetar" referred to here is is related to the old "Star Chamber" Courts, which

existed in England; and which were eventually abolished because they were so oppressive of the common

people. This is all shown through the following "Black's Law Dictionary" definitions:

So, to summarize: Ms Shapiro's main article, from the reputable "Georgetown Law Journal",

clearly declares that this Norman Conquest "Tore the Fabric" of the previously existing Anglo/Saxon and

related cultures then residing in England; and that this all resulted in "English Law" becoming "an

amalgam of diverse cultural influences" which "may fairly be seen as a composite of discrete (distinct)

elements from disparate sources". Here-under; a "New Capitalist Class" was established as the ruling

elite aristocracy in England; and this "New Capitalist Class" used the infamous "Star Chamber" Courts to

enforce its authoritarian rule over the common people of England.

Because in her article here, Ms Shapiro finds it Necessary to focus (in very large part) on the

influence of the group of people whom she identifies simply as "The Jews"; here-under, this author would

like to point out that I do believe that these people who are commonly identified as "Jews", were and are

really Not True Semitic/Israelite "Jews". First; when the issue of proper definition of this important word

is pressed, it will usually be admitted that, in its modernly usage at least; the word "Jew" has come to

refer Not to a Race or genetic-lineage of people, but to a "Religion". This "Jewish Religion", is most

this Religion, admit that modern "Rabbinical Judaism" finds its true roots, 2000 years ago, in the

Religion of the "Pharisees". That ancient "Pharisee Religion" opposed teachings of Jesus/Yeshuah, who

was dividing the Israelite People away from that Rabbinical-Jew/Pharisee Religion. The religious/legacy

ancestors of this modern Religion of "Rabbinical Judaism" is certainly what Ms Shapiro was was

referring to in her article above. Ms Shapiro was talking about a "community of people" who practiced

certain so-called "Jewish Laws". Observance of those so-called "Jewish Laws" is Not a Racial Indicator,

but a Belief-System Indicator, probably entirely (and at least similarly) "Religious" in its essential nature.

Here-under; this author would like to point out that the Torah-Laws of the True "Jews" of Israel

are concerned with sharing the benevolence and fairness of a loving, nurturing, and true God; and that

participating in any manner with efforts which "Tore the Fabric" of a conquered nation, is Not what the

True Followers of the God of Israel, YHWH, would do. In fact the Anglo/Saxons were practicing the true

Torah-Law of Israel (as already shown here-in), and these people who came in with the Norman

Conqueror were Actively Destroying this popular practice and observance of the True Torah-Laws of

Israel, as those Torah-Laws were already being practiced in England's Anglo/Saxon society.

This entire very convoluted dynamic is well illustrated by the Christian Bible, which seeks to

Separate "True Jews" (whom it supports), from the "False Jews", whom it condemns. This admonition is

expressed in the Biblical book of "Revelation" at chapters 2: 9 and 3; 9. These verses similarly read to

warn against those people who "say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie".

And although these extremely explosive "Religious Views" will be largely avoided in this

document, as declared by this author in my opening paragraphs; I will point out that: There have already

been shown in this document, very solid "Linkages" between the what our modern Anglo/American

Constitutional Jurisprudence considers to be Sociological "Natural-Law", and the Liberty-Preserving

"Torah-Laws" of Ancient Israel. Further, and as also shown here-in; the Anglo/Saxon system of

"Common-Law Government" Preserved those very Same Natural-Law based Israelite "Torah-Laws".

Once that Historical "Linkage" is Firmly Established in the students mind; then clarity may be gained in

mentally picturing an obscured historical reality in which: "these people 'Who Say they are Jews', are

Actively Participating in the Destruction of an Entire Culture of People who are Obedient to the Torah-

Laws of the True Jews of the Nation of Israel". At that point, it becomes more proper, to consider the

Anglo/Saxons, who are actually Practicing the Torah-Laws of ancient Israel, to be the True Israelite

"Jews"; and to consider that portion of the Conquering Invaders "Who Say they are Jews" to actually be

"Not" True Jews, "but who Lie" about the entire matter, just as Revelation 2:9 and 3:9 so identify them.

In attempts to be completely balanced; it was not only the Religious Community of the people

who "Say they are Jews", who are involved in supporting that evils of the "Norman Conquest" of

England, in 1066-ad. This author has at least two reputable citations which clearly declare that the Pope

of the Roman Catholic Church was Actively Engaged in the Support of that 1066-ad "Norman Conquest"

event. One brief citation in support of this point, reads as follows:

There are other citations available, but they are inconvenient to reproduce here and now. Those

other citations have proven to this author that this Pope not only sent money and soldiers to support that

"Norman Conquest" event, he also gave the invasion his Public Blessing. The Roman Church previously

had little or no influence in England, prior to that "Norman Conquest" event. Not unexpectedly;

immediately after that ""Conquest", the footings of the Roman Catholic Church became firmly

Established and wide-spread in England.

The main point to note here is that, this historical data shows clearly that: The people who "Say

they are Jews" and the Leadership of the Roman Catholic Church were 'Actively Working Together' to

Destroy (Tear the Fabric) of the Final Remnants of a Nation/State/Culture which was Actively Practicing

Obedience to Godly Israelite Torah-Laws.

This author presently considers that this is as far as is necessary and prudent to explore these

Regardless of the approximately 711-year-history, since that "Norman Conquest", of Hostile

Forces Attempting to Obliterate every remnant of this Freedom-Oriented, De-Centralized, Grass-Roots,

Mode of Responsible Self-Governing; it has still all some-how survived in-to our modern American

Constitutional System of Government. This very "Common-Law" Mode of Governing is solidly brought

with-in the spheres of modern American "Constitutional-Law", by way of numerous citations such as one

from: The Oregon Blue Book, 1997; as published by Oregon's Secretary of State; and under its section

on “County Government”, wherein is stated the following:

The main point from this citation, that, under our American Constitutional System of Government

"the American county ... is based on the Anglo-Saxon county of England dating back to about the time of

the Norman Conquest" can be supported through numerous other reputable sources (not presented herein,

because of time constraints). When considered together with the other citations already presented

here-in, especially from "Black's Law Dictionary"; these citations also show that this very ancient De-

Centralized Anglo/Saxon System of Localized and Popularly-Based "Common-Law" Self-Governing,

still Survives today under our modern Anglo/American Constitutional concepts of "Counties",

incorporated (in large part) into the larger body of our Modern American "Constitutional-Law". To argue

otherwise, is to argue that “Counties” are not a part of our modern nation's over-all system of general

"Constitutional-Law and Government". It is unlikely that any modern reputable American constitutionallaw

scholar will attempt to argue against that proposition.

It is particularly worthy to note here-under, that; the American-Revolution effectively Removed

All Remnants of the Oppression of that "Norman Conquest" which had been implemented over our

American Nations English Ancestors. The 1776 American-Revolution had been emphatically sought by

freedom- loving Englishmen, Scotsmen, Irishmen, and the like; ever since that fateful date in 1066-ad, or

for approximately 710 years. The American-Revolution was at least a 710 year-old dream come true for

our Nations Founders. Some people, including this author, consider it to be almost a 2000 year-old

"Dream Come True", since the Roman slave-traders Leveled the Temple and Destroyed Jerusalem and its

Torah-Law/Common-Law system of governing, in ad-70. This is why the Pilgrims called America "New

Jerusalem", and it is why Andrew Jackson and numerous other prominent Americans believed in our

nations "Manifest Destiny".

But no matter how the student calculates the time in which this "Dream" of "Free Government"

has been desperately held by America's Ancestors; the clear historical fact is that, in 1776, with the

"American Revolution", this ancient "Dream" Finally "Came True". This is a Critically Important Point

which Needs to be Inscribed in "Living-Light" in prominent places through-out our once grand American

nation.

During the months and years immediately prior to our American Revolution, prior to July 1776;

the Government of Britain was “DeFacto”, ie: it was not ruling in accord with the Fundamental, Organic ,

“Constitutional Law” of the Common-People of England. As previously here-in shown Anglo/American

Organic "Constitutional-Law" so clearly recognizes; tendencies to usurp and lawlessly exercise Power is

a very common affliction, which can only be Kept in Check by the Frequent use of "Accountability-

Checks" from the Common People. In order for abusive Usurpations of Power to Survive, they must be

kept in place through symbiotic relationships with other groups of people who have assembled unnaturally

massive amounts of Wealth. These massive consolidations of wealth can only be completed

through Debt-Collection Practices which Administer the "Force of the State" in Coercive and Non-

Voluntary Violation of the Fundamental, Organic, and Constitutional "Common-Law" of England.

Although the previously-existing "Stuart Monarchy" had previously also acted in lawless and

usurping manners, and lawful grounds did exist to oust and replace them with better national leadership;

the Stuarts had "Held The Line" against the Money-Changer/Banker Power; which, after the ouster of the

Stuarts, immediately began exercising free reign to lawlessly and coercively Enforce Debt-Collections in

England. As the direct result of the ousting of the Stuart monarchy, and shortly there-after, in the late

1600's; the “Bank of England” was established. There-after, and on to this day; almost every policy of

England's Parliament, their Courts, and of the Monarchy of England, have been Subservient to that

"Money Power".

During the months and years prior to our American Revolution; the money people behind the

Corporate-Veil of the “Bank of England” were effectively "In Control" of the Parliament, Courts, and the

Monarchy of England. There-under; these governmental office-holders had become extremely

Disconnected from any grass-roots, bottom-up, democratic, public/republic, Accountability-Mechanisms,

Government Responded in such Abusive and Lawless Fashion, to our forefathers petitions that they

respect our people's natural rights and liberties.

The Representatives in the English Parliament were mostly puppet/drones, who mindlessly

rubber-stamped what they believed to be the wishes of the Monarch. Just like their Monarch; those

Parliament Members were Not "Representative" of the collective consciousness of the Common People of

England. The Parliament Members had been selected by artificial means, in top-down/authoritarian

fashion, directly or in-directly, by the behind-the-scenes "Money-Power", to give the Colored Appearance

of a truly constitutional and representative bottom-up, grass-roots, democratic, republican selection

process. And they had similar or worse problems afflicting their higher Courts.

As already shown here-in; with-in the parameters of the un-written, organic, common-law based

English “Constitution”, the People who Hold the Offices of the True Organic/Constitutional Parliament

and Monarchy of England, were and are "Lawfully Required" to be a Bottom-Up, Grass-Roots Assembly

of the Representatives of the True Will of their Constitutional "Constituents", the Common People of

England. This is the Only Lawful Mandate for any office-holders, any-where, to exercise Any

Governmental Power. Un-Written Organic Constitutional-Law Requires Precisely This from All English

Constitutional Public-Office Holders, and that Includes the Members of the Parliament, the Courts, and

the Monarch. This is “The Law”; in its pre-existing, un-adulterated, Anglo/American, natural/organic and

true “Constitutional” form.

The history is clear that our American Founding Fathers had written numerous Reasonable

Letters and Petitions respectfully voicing Grievances over concerns for our Natural Rights and Liberties

to the Parliament and to the Monarch of England. Each time these letters, petitions, and grievances were

Rudely and Arrogantly Rebuked. The true Constitutionally-Lawful Representatives of the Common-

People of England, who organically compose that nation, would not have Responded so Rudely and

Arrogantly. Those Common People would have Recognized the "Justification" for our American Fore-

Fathers Petitions, if given the informed opportunity. Responding with such Rude Arrogance was Not in

the Best Interests of the Common English People, as later history has clearly proven.

The English People's True Organic/Constitutional Representatives, in the Parliament, the

Monarchy, and the Courts; were "Lawfully Required" to Responded in the Same Manner as reflected that

"Best Reasonable Response" of the Common People of England. Again; the Un-Written Organic

Constitutional-Law Requires Precisely This. Yet the British Legislators then in power were exercising

members of Parliament Failed to Honorably Respond to our Fore-Fathers Grievances, by reflecting the

True Informed Will of the Common English People; means clearly that, Those Officer Holders were

"Lawless", aka; "DeFacto" Holders of those High-Offices.

Because the people then holding the offices of the government of England were Exercising the

Power of those Offices Un-Lawfully, with-out any Responsible Concern for the Will of their

Constituents; they were immediately lawfully recognizable as being "Un-Lawful Occupants" of those

Offices, ie, they were members of an “Out-Law” and/or “DeFacto” Government of England.

Because there is No Lawful Obligation for "Obedience" to any Lawless/DeFacto Government,

especially when that governmental entity has "Defaulted" by "Failing to Respond" to "Complaints" of

"Criminal Abuses of its Powers"; here-under; our “United States of America” Founding-Forefathers

were entirely “Justified” in our Taking Up Arms and Throwing-Off the Tyranny of that Oppressive

Yet the current civil U.S. "Supreme Court" and "Legislative Assembly" almost always make

their "Declarations of Law" along these precise "Majority Rule" guidelines. Because this present civil

"Majority Rule" process is in Square "Conflict" with the Unanimous Decisions which emanate from

common-law Juries who follow constitutional "Due Process of Law", and because Both Processes Seem

to be Authorized by the obviously dysfunctional present "U.S. Constitution" document; here-under,

some-how, some-way, this "Conflict of Law" Must be Resolved. In this author's humble opinion; there

is probably no question before the people of this nation of greater importance.

The primary solution advocated by this author, through this document; is for honorable patriotic

Americans to Organize to Invoke a Return to a form of Government substantially similar to the Original

Uni-Cameral "Congressional Assembly" which was in place under the "Articles of Confederation". That

single Uni-Cameral Assembly had Lawful Authority to quickly and efficiently Assemble "Juries" from

the "Reputable Members" among their Delegates; and there-by to Unanimously "Speak Law" with that

"Single Voice" of their True Organic Natural-Law and Common-Law Authority.

Again, please remember from previous citations how Professor Hart so eloquently described a

"Single Voice" as being Necessary in order for "Law" to be Accurately Defined in our American

Constitutional Federal System of Government. By basically returning to the "Articles of Confederation",

as "Originally Intended"; and by slightly modifying or perhaps tweaking it's basic guide-lines a bit, to

direct that General Assembly to Select Twelve Jurors from their membership, to function as their more

efficient unanimous decision-makers; here-under; Modern Government Office Holders Can Lawfully

Speak with that Unanimous "Single Voice" which is Necessary for them to verbalize, in oder that they

may "Govern" this Nation in that specific manner which truly Harmonizes with the Fundamental

Principles of our American People's ancient and organically true "Constitutionally Law".

This ancient constitutional mode of administering "Due Process of Law", is a workable,

pragmatic, and "Scientific Process", for responsibly addressing all concerns of any legitimate

government. It is not only still recognized in our modern American Constitutional System of

Government; but (when the chaos and confusion of the subversive elements is finally dispelled), it is

Requited there-by. There really is no other "Lawful" choice here.

The Central Issue which this documents seeks to explore and define, is our American

Constitutional System of Law and Governing, and the “Fundamental Principles” upon which they rely.

Under both Written and Un-Written Definitions of this concept of our "American Constitution", another

powerful word may be used Synonymously. This word is "Federalism", and as shown elsewhere herein,

that word properly means "Maximizing Local Responsible Sovereign Self-Governing Authority".

Here-under; Public Servants of every sort will generally admit that, the “County Sheriff”

possesses the Supreme Lawful Authority to declare how Force will be administered with-in the

geographical boundaries of his county. Within the boundaries of his county, the "County Sheriff" has

more Lawful Authority that the President of the United States, more authority than the Chiefs of the FBI,

the US Marshals, the Department of Justice, the CIA, the IRS, or the Joint Chiefs of Staff in the

Pentagon. He has more Lawful Authority than the Governor of his State, than the State Police, and the

State's National Guard. Under both our Written and our Un-Written Organic American System of

"Constitutional-Law, the "County Sheriff" is the “Highest Law Enforcement Officer of the Land" (at

least with regard to all larger geographical jurisdictions, as mentioned above). The Written "U.S.

Constitution" and the various written State Constitutions all recognize this; and probably all popular

constitutional-law scholars will at least begrudgingly admit this.

The previously cited definition from "Black's Law Dictionary" of the word "Sheriff" specifically

declares that: "He is ... the chief conservator of the peace with-in his territorial jurisdiction". This basic

common-law rule is the same all over America. Yet it is clearly dysfunctional for the Sheriff to be the

“Highest Law-Enforcement Officer in the County": and yet not also be Lawfully empowered to bring

the Criminals he arrests into a “Court of Law” in which his decisions could be fully adjudicated by the

local county people who placed him in that office. This is true because the Entire Larger Purpose of

placing this tremendous amount of Law-Enforcement Power in the hands of the Local County Sheriff, is

to allow the Local County Community to “Responsibly Self-Govern”, to the fullest extent that it is

capable.

If this County Sheriff is going to operate in accord with his “Higher Law” charges to “Keep the

Peace” in that County; then it would be self-defeating to allow any outsiders to define whether or not he

is Lawfully "Keeping the Peace" there-in. The Sheriff and his deputies would be reduced to puppets of

the out-side jurisdiction. The above citations concerning "County", "Comitatus", and "Shire"; clearly

indicate that the Anglo/American Constitutional "County" is "Sovereign" in conducting these "Peace

Keeping " responsibilities. And further research indicates clearly that the "County Officers" actually

have a "Duty" to to "Keep the Peace" through Their Own "Courts of Justice", aka: "Courts of Law", in

this essentially "Sovereign" Manner. This is the entire thrust of the “Special and Local”, hands-off,

provisions in the various State Constitutions; such as previously quoted from Oregon’s Constitution, at

Article 4 Section 23.

How-ever; the advocates of authoritarianism have routinely objected that such policies will lead

to chaos, confusion, and anarchy; with each local jurisdiction enforcing radically differing rules of social

behavior, thus causing break-down of respect among society's differing jurisdictions. In response; this

author admits that each such small jurisdiction does have the lawful authority to experiment with its own

community's unique ideas concerning how "Natural-Law" should operate in their own community (as

seemingly was done among the Anglo/Saxons prior to 1066-ad). How-ever; this author also contends

that such a break-down in the general norms of behavior in the larger jurisdictions is very unlikely occur

because of at least two significant factors.

First, the Fundamental Principles of Organic Constitutional-Law Require that, when the Leaders

of each of these smaller sovereign jurisdictions is Elected to his Community Leadership Office, at the

same time this same general Organic-Law Requires that the Community Delegate to him or her the Full

Lawful Authority to act as a “Representative” and Delegate from his smaller community, in-to the the

next larger jurisdiction in the common-law hierarchy of townships, precincts, counties; and so-on, above

them. If, some-how, theoretically speaking; the community members from with-in one Leader's smaller

jurisdiction are habitually invoking policies which are at significant Divergence from "Natural-Law";

then, in the General-Assembly or Court of the Next Larger Jurisdiction, the collected delegates there-in

will surely communicate significant "Peer-Pressure" on that smaller jurisdiction's representative/delegate

to communicate to the members of his smaller jurisdiction, the concerns of their larger community, that

the smaller community is acting irresponsibly.

This is true, because, at the even larger jurisdiction still, a “Single Voice” has to be presented

from all of the community leaders, as to how “Natural-Law” is suppose to function with-in their

communities. Here-under; “Good-Faith Communications” about how to Define this Sociological

“Natural-Law” Must be Maintained at All of the Jurisdictional Levels. And any community member, at

any level, who actively obstructs the ability of his next larger community of delegates to Speak with a

“Single Voice” concerning how Natural-Law should function with-in their general jurisdiction, is thereby

setting him-self Out-Side of the supreme Sociological Natural-Law, which in turn makes him an

“Out-Law”, who needs to be removed from the community, with what-ever force is necessary. Through

this last-resort tool of Community Ostracism, Consensus and Order is maintained in each level of each

common-law community. Here-by, each separate smaller sovereign community maintains its collective

duties to their neighboring and larger communities to responsibly self-govern. This is a very important

factor to note, and it makes it extremely improbable that proper common-law communities will

degenerate into anarchistic chaos and confusion.

Second; the Unanimous Verdicts of the Twelve (12) Member "Juries" of the Common

Reputable People in each of these Local Communities of this nation is Very Difficult to Obtain. Clearly;

it is very Difficult to gain Full Agreement between Twelve Individual Free-Thinking People. When that

Unanimous Agreement is finally Achieved, in each of this local communities, it is Reasonable to

Presume that the Verdict rendered there-in is at least a fairly Close Approximation of Sociological

"Natural-Law". There-under; such verdict, if at all divergent from pure "Natural-Law" may reasonably

be presumed to be Not Diverging very far there-from.

To build on this second point further; the Juries of these separate local sovereign jurisdictions

are fully capable of Responsibly Judging whether or not Higher "Natural/Organic Law" is being

followed or broken by their own local County Sheriff, or by any other individual with-in their county's

geographical boundaries. In other words; these Unanimous Twelve-Member Juries are fully capable of

insuring to all concerned out-side jurisdictions that "Natural-Law" is being sufficiently Respected within

their jurisdiction, so that there is absolutely no justification for any other outside jurisdiction to

interfere in that local jurisdiction’s own internal affairs.

This is how every smaller local County and Precinct Jurisdiction in our entire American nation is

Suppose to Function under our written State and National Constitutions, and under the fundamental

organic-law principles which are espoused in those documents, and under the traditional and "Originally-

Intended" Definitions of "Federalism", "Republicanism", and "Common-Law"; as espoused there-in. In

light of these logical realities, it should be quite clear to the reader, that, there are absolutely No Natural-

Law based Logical Reasons Why the Common-Law Juries who reside with-in these Local Jurisdictions

can not Exercise that "Full Sovereignty" over All "Peace-Keeping" concerns with-in their own

jurisdiction's geographical boundaries.

As the above citations indicate; the "County Sheriff" is recognized in both Common-Law, and in

most written State Constitutions and Statutes as a “Peace Officer”. This “Peace Keeping Function" is his

"Highest Duty". Civil “Statutory Laws” are Not Needed in order for him to accurately define, and

enforce that simple natural-law based concept of "Keeping the Peace". This is true because Local Fully-

Informed "Juries", who have Functional-Consciences and Minimal-Intelligence, are fully capable of

following the fairly simple “Rules of the Common-Law”, "Maxims of Law", and "Due Process of Law",

in their own self-governing decision-making processes. These Juries, in their own Local Courts of the

Counties and Precincts, can harmoniously and quite adequately work with their own local Sheriffs or

Constables to "Keep the Peace" in their County. There is absolutely no natural need or benefit for any

County in our American nation to make any reference what-so-ever to any "Statutory Enactments" from

any Majority-Rule governed larger Civil Jurisdiction. Traditional Anglo/American "Maxims of Law"

provide all of the guidance and direction which any of those local jurors need. By their complete

Abandonment of any mechanism for seeking “Consensus”, the fashionable Majority-Rule based

"Statutory Enactments" of the Roman-law based Civil Jurisdictions are clearly Not at all Concerned with

achieving complete Harmony with the constitutionally-supreme "Natural-Law". On the other hand;

when Local Jurors are properly selected from the "Qualified Electors" of “Good Reputation” in their

own County and Precinct Neighborhoods, then these "Common-Law Juries" are exceedingly Efficient

Assemblies for producing Harmony with that constitutionally-prioritized and supreme "Natural-Law".

There is No Constitutional Provision which authorizes any Federal or State Officers to monitor

or meddle in these localized self-governing common-law jurisdictions. Neither the Civil “State Police”,

nor any "Federal Bureau of Investigation", not the "US Marshals" have any Constitutionally-Lawful

Authority to attempt to intervene in these Locally Controlled "Peace Keeping" Duties. Those civil

executive officers from the larger jurisdictions, are only constitutionally authorized to exercise a

jurisdiction with-in the individual Counties of this nation, if some responsible officer of any such smaller

County "Invites Them In" through a consensus-based public-declaration that an "Emergency" condition

exists with-in that County. Other-wise, these local County Jurisdictions are Constitutionally-Required to

be "Left Alone" by the officers of those larger civil executive jurisdictions. This is how American

Constitutional-Law is Designed to Work, in its naturally-harmonious relations between its smaller and

larger organic governmental jurisdictions. The written "U.S. Constitution" document, and the various

State Constitutions, all recognize this reality, quite firmly. Ex-President Clinton's above quoted

Executive Order clearly Confirms Precisely This, as do other related documents.

Here-under; "We" the common "American People" have the Constitutional Right and Duty to

form our own smaller communities, so-as-to Elect our Own "Common-Law Police-Officers", called

"Peace Officers" and “Constables” at the Township and Precinct levels; and to Elect our own

"Common-Law Court Judges", called "Justices of the Peace" at the Precinct level. "Sheriff “and

"County Judge" are the general common-law terms to be used at the County-Level. And so long as each

of these communities are not clearly guilty of any significant breach of their Common-Law Duty to

"Responsibly Self-Govern" under these general Natural-Law guide-lines; then No Other Humans on the

planet have any Lawful Authority to Trespass into any of these Sovereign "Common-Law Jurisdictions".

And if any such trespasses do occur, then the members of those communities have the Lawful

Jury-Trials for Judging if any such trespassing event was "Lawful", is to be Held In the Courts and

before Juries composed of the Electors chosen from That Local Jurisdiction; just as the Sixth

Amendment so specifically declares.

The "Fundamental Principles of American Constitutional Law and Government" are firmly

derived from the principles and concepts of Sociological "Natural-Law", as articulated in the

"Declaration of Independence", and by Blackstone, Locke, and others; prior to the American War for

Independence; and as recognized through many reputable citations contained in this document.

True American Constitutional-Law is articulated through a "Singe Voice", as articulated by

Professor Hart here-in.

Among many frequently conflicting voices, this "Single Voice" is best identified through the

Consensus-based "Unanimous Verdicts" of Twelve-Member "Common-Law Juries", who are free to use

their own Consciences and Reasoning Capabilities, to the maximum extent that they are capable.

Examples of historical real-world societies who practiced these these "Natural Law" based

Fundamental Principles of American Constitutional Law and Government, may be found in the history

of the Anglo-Saxons of England, prior to the "Norman Conquest" of 1066-ad; and in the Nation of

Israel, 3400 years ago; and for a short time in in early America, between the dates of 1776 and 1789.

In modern America, the Common People still have the right to practice this Natural-Law,

through our rights to form our own Juries, in our own smaller "Common-Law Jurisdictions" of our

Counties, and even smaller precincts, townships, churches, trade-unions, and other similar voluntary

associations. Further; and as illustrated through the "Seventh Amendment" in the "U.S. Constitution"

document, and in similar provisions in our nations various written State "Constitutions"; we have the

Right to bring similar "Common-Law Jury-Trail" Process to bear at our National and State Levels.

Further here-under; Average Americans have the Constitutionally-Secured Rights to seek true

Natural-Law based "Justice" by way of Filing and Prosecuting Their Own Sworn "Criminal-Complaints"

against Any Corrupted Public-Servant who may Conspire to Abuse Any of their Natural Rights. The

Officers of the Civil-Courts of this Nation and our various States have Constitutional-Duties to Facilitate

these Criminal-Complaints, Directly, with-out necessitating any prosecutorial involvement from any

district-attorney or attorney-general. This last point is only thinly explained here-in, and is more fully

documented in the accompanying document from this same author, and entitled similarly to:

"Memorandum in Support of Quo Warranto".

Modern Americans have Numerous Tools available to them, to place pressure on the present

office holders at all levels of national, state, and local government, to move those respective

governmental entities in the direction of a Natural-Law Based "More Perfect Union". Although the

forces of oppression are entrenched and popularly considered unstoppable, the serious student of

American Constitutional-Law has Just Cause for retaining Optimism that those Despotic Agendas can be

Countered and Thwarted, and that a truly wonderful, peaceful, and just society can be created in

America, in the very near future.

1: This phrase is based on the phrase "Consent of the Governed" as used in the second paragraph of our

nation's "Declaration of Independence".

2: Many of these words about Sociological "Natural-Law" are "Self-Evident" to many, who instinctively

know these things. But it is also self-evident that there are multitudes of other people in our American

nation who have absolutely no idea what these concepts are all about. Here-under; those who are not

familiar with these ideas (if they are receptive), will benefit clearly form these ideas being articulated in

detail here-in. And those who already know of these things, may find it useful to see the manners in

which these ideas are here-in articulated, so that they may more clearly communicate these ideas to those

who are unfamiliar with them. Also; through strategic use of this "Memorandum" document's

presentation of these Natural-Law concepts under-lying our American Constitutional System of

Government, Judges who are sitting on Cases in which readers have an interest, may be forced to "Take

Judicial Notice" of these Fundamental Principles of our American Constitutional-Law; and there-after, if

the Judge Willfully Violates these Fundamental Constitutional Natural-Law based Principles, he can be

Prosecuted (either civilly or criminally), for Willfully Violating the Readers Constitutionally-Secured

Rights.

3: Although this author does not have documentation to prove it, he does believe that the word "Logic"

may be so historically related to the word "Law", that there may be good historical grounds for spelling

the word "Logic" as "Lawgic". Clearly, they are pronounced essentially the same; and in light of this

citation, they do seem to have related meanings. If this linkage could be proven to exist, then it would

lend even more support to a central proposition of this document, to the effect that all all written or oral

declarations which are not "Logical" are Neither "Lawful" Nor "Law".

4: Probably less than 1% of modern Americans presently have any idea of these Fundamental Concepts of

American Constitutional Law and Government. Yet, because many people in our nation speak with

conflicting tones of authority on this very subject, the serious student of this study will surely be

confronted by significant peer-pressure from numerous others, to compromise clearly learned concepts, as

the only condition under which the student will be allowed to maintain peace with those others. And so,

the serious student of Constitutional-Law should be well prepared to resist these social pressures to

compromise his or her clearly learned "Fundamentals", and to resolve personally to tenaciously adhere to

them. (The student should not allow loud platitudes from any fashion-conscious and/or immensely

popular gurus in this field to dissuade him or her from what he personally knows to be true. For those

students with a religious inclination; you will give an accounting before God for how you handle this

sacred “Trust”; which through this text, and by his grace, has now been bestowed up-on you.)

5: "Christian-Law" and "Israelite Torah-Law" are the Religious phrases which this author considers

synonymous with the previously mentioned more secular phrases. There are probably similar "Natural-

Law" based terms in the Religions of the Muslims, the Buddhists, the Hindus, the American Indians; and

in most other religious belief systems. These "Religious Issues" are intended to be discussed more

thoroughly in a future document composed by this author.

6: Black’s Law Dictionary, West Pub. Co., St Paul Minn. (Unless otherwise noted, all citations in this

document are from the 5th edition of Black’s Law Dictionary)

been Preserved in the un-written Anglo/English “Constitutional” System of Government; and actually,

strong arguments can be made that it is preserved in every other system of government practiced with-in

every other nation on this planet.

8: Johnston v. Hunter, 40 S. E. 448, 449, 50 W.Va. 52 quoting & adopting the definition in Mills v.

Comm, 13 Pa. 630; as published in “Words and Phrases”, the 90-volume set of law-books published by

the reputable "West Publishing Company".

Originating from the Decisions of Individual Civil “Judges”, is a “Lie”. While it is true that the decisions

of these Judges have been grafted into what has modernly become identified by the orthodox, aristocratic

establishment as “Common-Law” and “Maxims of Law”; those modern orthodox and aristocratic

Definitions do Not Reach Back past what they refer to as “Legal Memory”, and prior to the “Norman

Conquest of 1066 ad”, to when the True and Original “Common-Law Government” was in place.

10: This ancient Anglo/American "Common-Law" can trace its sources back even further into the

Organic/Constitutional-Laws of ancient Germany, and even further back to the Laws of ancient Israel.

11: "Encyclopedia of the American Constitution"; Federalism; Leonard W. Levy, Claremont Graduate

School, Claremont California; Kenneth L Karst, University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Dennis

J. Mahoney, Claremont Graduate School, Claremont California; McMillian Publishing Co., New York;

1986

12: I do not have the citation presently, but i will try to provide it in future editions of this document.

13: And bringing forth an American National "Supreme Common-Law Court" would be almost the

complete fulfillment of the end-goal of that "More Perfect Union", which is mandated to be sought

through our national written "U.S. Constitution" document's "Preamble".

14: The Task now at Hand for True Supporters of America's Spiritually-Based Fundamental Natural,

Organic, "Constitutional-Law", is to Assist in Facilitating As Many "Common-Law Jury-Trials" As

Possible; so-as-to Entirely Shut-Down All Non-Common-Law Jurisdiction of America's Civil Court

System. This is a "Constitutionally-Necessary Step" in our Mandated Search for that "More Perfect

Union" which has so honorably been expressed in our nations "U.S. Constitution" document's

"Preamble".

15: This author has wrestled with problems of how to frame the central issues sought to be covered in

this document, efficiently; and still not appear eccentric. Because this memorandum/document is desired

to be a foundational document for other similar memorandum/documents, as well as to be foundational

for various criminal complaints; and for the sake of efficiency; I have decided to take chances on whether

or not some narrow-minded people in powerful positions may consider my work here to be too radical to

be accepted as serious scholarship. I will just have to learn to live with their negative energy. In order for

a full picture to be painted for the modern student of American Constitutional-Law, ages-old battles must

be pointed out, and modern conspiracies masking those ages-old battles must also be pointed out.

16: “Of the Civil Law and the Common Law”, as written by Samuel Tyler, ll. D., Professor in the Law

Department of Columbian College, Washington, D. C..; that text written as an "Introduction" to the book

entitled: “A Treatise on the Principles of Pleading in Civil Actions: ... ” By Henry John Stephen, Sergeant

at Law. 1871.

17: Although the "Religious Views" related to this subject are believed by this author to hold the ultimate

Key to the fully utopian/idealistic "More Perfect Union" Solution to All Problems related to Clearly

Identifying these "Fundamental Principles"; here-under, this author believes that probably approximately

96% of the "Answers" to these pressing American National Community Questions, can be obtained

through wording every idea expressed in this study, in largely non-religious, non-theological, and purely

"Secular" terms. By at least Temporarily Framing this documents examination of these "Fundamental

Principles of American Constitutional Law and Government" in these more "Secular" Terms; here-under

are left remaining to be examined in an immensely Productive, comparatively and refreshingly un-heated

and "Cool" mechanical step-by-step "Scientific" Discussion, 100% of all potential answers to these

critically important questions. Another benefit of this "Secular Strategy", is that: those many honest

people with at least minimally Functional "Consciences", who have understandably been made Angry at

the Epidemic of Cold-Hearted Hypocrisy which has so very clearly Infected the Leadership of almost

Every Denomination of "Religion" on this planet, may be warmly invited into this discussion, all with-out

any realistic fears from their quadrant that the framework of this discussion has been engineered in

manners prejudicial against their legitimately justified concerns.

Although it does run counter to this author's strong personal religious beliefs; this author does

believe that quite sufficient argument can be made, with-out any reference to "Religion", to prove this

document's central proposition that the deeper and more powerful "Fundamental Law" underlying our

"American Constitutional System of Government" is firmly based on what can accurately be termed

"Sociological Natural-Law". By at least temporarily adopting this "Secular Focus", each and every single

one of the extremely Wide Diversity of very emotionally-charged "Religious Views" can easily be

grouped together and (at least temporarily) Set Off to one Side of this very broad-based "Constitutional

Philosophy" discussion, for much fuller examination at a later time, in another document.

The remaining body of Secular Philosophical Thought related here-to, may be accurately

summarized as "Sociological Natural-Law”, or perhaps as "Community-Based Organic-Law". Our

American Nations Fashionable Presumption that there is in place a "Separation of Church and State"

Doctrine, should lend support to this more secular/scientific and less-heated focus for this discussion.

Please note also that this author is a seriously Religious man, but that I view it to be "God's Will" that this

discussion proceed in this Secular manner; at least in part because there are multitudes of "False Religious

Views" in this nation, and on this planet; and by first finding firm footing in this non-denominational

"Secular View", that those "False Religious Views" will be more easily identified and rejected. The

"Religious Battle" will be the "Final Battle".

This "Secular Strategy" will allow for immense Increases in efforts at pragmatic, expedient, and

secular "Productivity" in trying to Clearly "Identify" these "Fundamental Principles" of our American

"Constitutional Law". This author believes that the issues involved in this study will eventually be Forced

into very Far-Reaching Application by All-Encircling Out-Side Conflict from what will eventually and

finally appear as Two Polarized Religious Communities.

Once these "Fundamental Principles" are Proven to have a pragmatically workable and "Firm

Earthly Foundation", solidly built upon what may be recognized in purely Secular Terms as "Sociological

Natural-Law"; then, from this "Working Secular Definition of these "Fundamental Principles", a literally

Rock-Solid, secular, earthly-based Foundation and Firm-Footing of Pragmatic Work-ability may be

gained, through which to Clearly Distinguish between the Sacred and the Evil Sacrifices in Human Blood,

which are so Routinely being Offered up to their separate deities, from the Two then clearly visible and

very visibly Polarized and separately Divided Remaining Religious Factions.

Yes. The foundation of the stage for Armageddon to occur will be firmly laid. Secularism will

be firmly exhausted. It will die its dying breath, and then two remaining religious factions will gather all

of the fence-sitters into their separate jurisdictions, and this author does not presently predict further. But

there will come a time when there will be "no atheists in foxholes", and this author will take some small

delight there-in. Those religious people who may be inclined think this author may be a closet "secular

humanist", because he prioritizes the secular before the theological in this document, will be well

rewarded if they hold their tongue. This conservative author is betting very heavily on precisely this series

of events occurring.

18: This prohibition against Religious-Institutions influencing our national government in an "Un-

Natural" or socially dis-harmonious manner, is absolutely "Identical" to the prohibitions contained in our

nations secular and criminal laws against any organization or corporation so influencing our government

in that negative manner. Any group of persons who conspire to affect our government in this negative

manner, whether religious or not, can be sent to jail for engaging in such a conspiracy.

19: It is worthy of note that arguments have been made (which seem plausible to this author), that the

“U.S. Constitution” document was Only Designed to Control the Actions of the Public- Servants of the

Federal Government; and that it was Not Designed in any way to Limit the Liberty of “We the People”.

Although this line of thought would accurately describe and harmonize well with that document's

Romanistic "Civil" nature, and with its basic power-centralizing and empire-building character; yet it has

the technical draw-back that it is a serious mis-use of the ancient and basically good word "Constitution".

20: 10th Edition, Corley & Robert, Prentice Hall Inc. 1975, Chp 1, Law & Sources, Pgs 5 & 6

21: As implied by the Ninth and Tenth Amendments there-in, an even larger study of the History and

Philosophy up-on which our American Constitutional-Law are based, will yield much more insightful

results, than will a detailed study of that written document.

22: Commentaries on the Laws of England, By: Sir William Blackstone, KT.; (1753-1766) Edited by

William Casey Jones; Director of the School of Jurisprudence, University of California; Berkeley,

California; 1915. Page 39, Section 38; 2. ss39: 3. Pages 39(57) - 42(65). SS 43: Early Judicial Systems.

23: Most modern communities are constantly subjected to smiley-face Deceptions which mask the

common and routine hostile take-over and enslavement schemes which exist in our modern corporatecontrolled

class-warfare-ridden Anglo/American society.

24: In England, ever since when any Written Mandates (such as Statutes) have been used by those in

positions of control of the central government (in their efforts to command their constituents obedience,

and even though it similarly may seem very illogical to many) and on to this very day; all such Written

Mandates have been argued by those in control of the central governing power to be similarly "In

Harmony" withe these more Fundamental and Organic, and there-by Truly "Constitutional Laws".

25: Yet it is worthy to consider that prior to all of these in importance, is “Truth". For if "We the People"

are not able to have access to “Truth”; then "Justice" and all other prioritized end-goals will be

compromised, and there-by evil men will surly find opportunity to use deception to pillage and plunder

our more trusting and vulnerable organic body-politic members. Here-under; please note that this

document is designed to communicate with people who believe that "Truth" can be clearly identified; and

that once it has been so identified, that it must be preserved and defended. Those who do not believe that

objective "Truth" can be rationally identified by the human mind, such as possibly "Moral Relativists";

may as well put down this document now, because we have already lost you.

This thought is pursued in the spirit of avoiding any un-necessary discussion of the controversial

"Religious" realm, but still taking this all at least to a lower-level (and comparatively secular-humanist

friendly) "Spiritual Plane".

26: As a contextual note, the modernly heavily relied on statute and civil-judge made case-precedent

citation books should only to function in Aid of that “Reasoning “ process. In and of themselves, such

text-books should not be used as excuses for limiting the parameters of the solution-options available to

our leaders, in Conscionably deciding the best solution to the current problems pressing on our national

organic body-politic.

27: They may not have used such modern terminology as "Sociological"; but the concept of "Natural-

Law" was well-known in those times, and that was the direct object of achievement in those earlier

Anglo/American Jury-Trail discussions.

28: In this citation, the word "and" directly before the phrase "the law of the land", is frequently rendered

"or". That "or" phrasing is deliberately designed to give despotically inclined government agents wiggleroom

to avoid the "trial by jury process", which is the primary ingredient in "the law of the land".

"Lysander Spooner" in his classical "An Essay on the Trial by Jury"; made this very point the central

point of his entire book. You can not have "law of the land" without "trial by jury". You can not have

"due process of law" without "trial by jury". Despotic Romanistic civil/municipal systems of conflict

resolution have been at war with our Anglo/American system of jury-trial based de-centralized selfgovernance

for centuries, most notably at their successful campaign of hostile take-over during the

"Norman Conquest" of England in 1066 ad. Spooner set the record straight. He is a true

Anglo/American hero.

29: Findlaw: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment05/11.html#f3

30: How convenient this must have been for the bankers, lawyers, and other aristocratic classes, who

stood to gain so handsomely from not only those "Malum Prohibitum" based social-engineering codes

(which inherently supported both increased litigation and flow of credit-debt based commercial activity);

but also from the pillage and plunder of the war itself.

31: Encyclopedia Americana, International Edition, 1963; Common Law / Historical Survey / Anglo-

Saxon Law /

Dean Roscoe Pound and Professor Felix Frankfurter; Studies from Princeton, Johns Hopkins, Columbia

and Harvard Universities).

33: The phrase "Beyond Legal Memory; is usually defined as all time-periods prior to the so-called

"Norman Conquest" of England, in 1066-ad.

34: Thomas Jefferson spoke of and warned against an "Un-Natural Aristocracy". He also spoke of a

"Natural Aristocracy" who actually cared for the welfare of the common-people, and who deserved to be

placed in positions of leadership, but who were routinely subverted there-from, by the powerful and

organized dark forces from with-in the un-natural aristocracy. I do not recall the precise citation, but i

believe it should not be difficult to find, & i will plan on inserting it here in future editions of this text.

35: “Administrative Justice and the Supremacy of Law in the United States”; John Dickenson, 1927; by

the President and Fellows of Harvard College; 1955. Pages: 3, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37, & 38.

37: Beacon Theaters, Vs. Westover, US Supreme Court (1959); 359 U.S. 500, 79 S,Ct. 948, 3 L.Ed. 988.

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=359&invol=500

38: Dickenson's above-quoted text is also quoted in that Quo-Warranto Memorandum.

39: In particular, this document goes to much greater lengths in explaining how Power really is in our

American People, and the much more detailed History behind this and related concepts.

40: Anarchy would probably be preferable to those majority-rule based statutory enactments. At least

violations of sociologically natural/organic law would not be institutionalized and supported by the

coercive-force of the state.

41: If consensus is achieved that a particular policy is in the common-people's best interests, then that

policy is “Constitutional”. If that “Consensus” can not be achieved, then the proposition is either “Not

Constitutional”; or else there is a subversive or “Out-Law” in the legislative assembly, who heeds to be

removed through the “Consensus” of the remaining honorable Law-Abiding members of the assembly.

This is Fundamental, Organic, “Constitutional Law”, at its un-adulterated essence. It is all basically that

simple. The more serious problem is finding honorable people with the courage to firmly govern their

behavior by this “Constitutional-Law”.

42: Such a Significant "Diversion" occurred in 1789, and the proper, organic, and truly "Constitutionally-

Lawful" course, has never been returned to. During the so-called "Civil War" of the 1860's, another

significant "Diversion" occurred, and it threw our American Constitutional "Ship of State" even further

off of its "Constitutional Course". Numerous other significant "Diversions" have occurred in even more

recent times.

43: "In any prosecution for an offense, justification, as defined in ORS 161.195 to 161.275, is a defense."

http://landru.leg.state.or.us/ors/161.html

44: This powerful and hostile 'Private Interest Group' pressed quickly and harshly the delegates from the

states to Rush in the Adoption of the so-called Written “U.S. Constitution” document. For lack of better

terms, that document was “Crammed Down the Throats” of the delegates of the States, and no kind words

of reconciliation were said in efforts to mitigate that humiliation there-after. This humiliation and

usurpation of the “Rights of th States”, is the legacy of the so-called “Anti-Federalists” (although in the

light of pre-defined “Federalism”, the so-called “Anti-Federalists” were really more “Federal”, than were

the so-called “Federalists”).

This author has wrestled with this document for a significant time, in efforts at gracefully

avoiding this painful and ugly issue; hoping to be able to avoid or surgically remove into another

document all discussion of the “Lawlessness” of the 1789 adoption of that written so-called “U.S.

Constitution” document. This author has no come to realize that, that document has become so

entrenched in the minds of the majority of our American People (including many “Public Servants” who

hold governmental offices) as embodying the full and complete definition of the Pre-Existing Word

“Constitution”, that it will be Absolutely Impossible to gain sufficient space in the minds of readers to

prove the above mentioned “Natural-Law” Basis for the Truly “Constitutional” System of Government

for this once great nation, unless that monstrous concept is surgically removed from their brains. And so;

this document proceeds.

45: This 'Constitutionally-Lawless Machinery of Government', has been purposefully set in place, all soas-

to serve the 'Private Agenda' of that powerful 'Private Interest-Group', by way of Conspiracy', so-as-to

better enable them to pillage and plunder the organic body-politic of our common American people.

These points are much more fully explained in the above-mentioned and probably accompanying

document entitled "The Artificial/Lawless/DeFacto American Government". That document and perhaps

a few others by this author; will be referenced frequently here-in. It is not necessary for students students

of American Constitutional-Law to accept this "Conspiracy" proposition, before assimilating this article.

But unless serious students are fully aware of this powerful undercurrent of distractions which have

permeated our modern American society, and which will surely be brought to bear on their thinking, in

one way or the other; then they will be plagued by nagging thoughts concerning 'Why' the arguments

which are made here-in, are so very out-of-sync with what passes as scholarship and conventional

wisdom regarding these general issues. Be very clear; Pressure Will be Brought to Bear on all such

serious students of American Constitutional-Law, to shift their thinking in accord with that conventionalwisdom,

so that they are not empowered by their superior knowledge to become another influential critic

of and potential threat to that powerful 'Private Interest Groups" which presently actually run this nation.

Here-under; it will be very beneficial to keep in mind that it is going to take a significant amount of

mental-energy to break through the obstacles of "group-think" which have habitually hindered the great

progress which can be made by individuals who seek to seriously study these 'Fundamental Principles of

American Constitutional Law and Government'.

46: Essays in Anglo Saxon Law; A Republication of an Original Work; Published by Little, Brown, and

Company; Boston, 1876; Second Printing: 1905; 1997 Facsimile of 1905 Edition, with an Introduction by

James Kellogg. Scepter Publishing, 162 Collins Road, N.E. No. 211, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, February,

1997. Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1876, by Little Brown, and Company; in the

Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington. The University Press, Cambridge, Mass., U.S.A. To:

Charles William Eliot; President of Harvard College, This Volume, Fruit of His Administration is

Respectfully Dedicated.

47: Please recall that it was that Same "Roman Empire" which Crucified the alleged "Messiah of Israel" a

mere 400 years or so before these Germanic Anglo/Saxons were Migrating to England.

48: Like the word "Decade", the word "Deacon" also is related to this word "Ten".

49: Please note that, in contrast to this ancient system, the Modern American and English Congressional

Assemblies are divided into Two Bodies, and even worse, their Judicial and Executive functions are

entirely alienated from their control. This modern disaster was all accomplished by a self-serving and

malicious group of wealthy and powerful aristocrats, so-as-to Obstruct the Congressional Assembly's

ability to respond to hostile organic parasite classes, who desired to pillage and plunder the common

American People. From the very start, those aristocrats did Not Trust the American People, or even by

the Peoples Elected Delegates.

50: That entire study traverses into "Religious Issues" which are generally sought to be avoided in this

memorandum/document; but concerning which there are at least two other memorandum/documents in

accompaniment here-to, and by this same author, which shed much more light on this issue; and this

author plans to compose another memorandum/document which will focus more squarely on addressing

that important "Religious Issue", as time allows.

51: "The Shetar’s Effect on English Law - A Law of the Jews Becomes the Law of the Land"; The

Georgetown Law Journal, Volume 71, Pages 1179 - 1200; By: Judith A. Shapiro. (Date of publication

unknown from this authors photocopy form the "Journal", but from foot-notes, appears to be after 1979)

52: The proper terms for the Race (which is commonly confused with this religious term) is "Israelites",

"Israelis", or "Semites".

53: This author does believe that further pursuit of these issues will lead the serious student to profound

insight. I do plan of writing a similar memorandum/document as this one, on that issue, in the future.

54: Not only Local Common-Law survives; but also legal authority for self-governing "Special"

Jurisdictions survive. These would be like Churches, Trade-Unions, Fraternities, and other voluntary

associations.

55: See: “Pawns in the Game”, by William Guy Carr, Commander in the Canadian Navy.

56: Please also note that any usurping members of legislative assemblies, courts, and monarchies, are not

going to admit to such a lawless disconnection with the common people; because that would endanger

their ability to continue in their self-serving course of action. So any case designed to assemble evidence

of such as usurping and/or abusive office-holders, will be very hard to obtain, and will probably have to

be compiled from more circumstantial and out-side sources.

57: It was an over-reaction and unfortunate side-effect to that other-wise entirely lawful and justified

rebellion process when our nations “Declaration of Independence” formalized our nations Separation

from the organic body-politic of the common People of England. The DeFacto King & his abusive

henchmen were the only community of people whom we needed to Declare our Independence from. The

organic body of the English/British Common People, continue to be our distant constitutional/organic

brethren.

58: These communities have these Duties not only for their Own Community, but also as a first line of

defense against out-side aggressors for all of their neighboring law-abiding communities.